Metallosis after using distal fibular locking plate for lateral malleolar fractures: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION

Studies regarding the development of metallosis following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fractures are rarely found in orthopedic literature. The aim of the current study was to assess metallosis following ORIF using distal fibular locking plates to treat distal fibular fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

69 patients who underwent surgery using locking compression plates to treat lateral malleolar fractures, with a minimum 1-year follow-up period and subsequent hardware removal were enrolled in our study. We divided the patients into 2 groups, to compare the complications and demographics: 38 patients, treated with ZPLP plate; 31 patients, treated with other plates.

RESULTS

During 1 year of postoperative follow-up, 20 complications developed: 6 superficial infections at the operative site, 1 case of nonunion, 3 cases of osteitis, 4 cases of hypaesthesia, 2 cases of peripheral neuropathy, and 4 cases of metallosis. No statistical difference was found in the rate of complications when comparing the treatment groups (Mann-Whitney U test, p < .05) except for metallosis. All 4 patients who developed metallosis were treated using a ZPLP plate, and metallosis did not develop at all in patients who underwent surgery using other plates.

CONCLUSION

In our study, metallosis developed more than was previously known, particularly after using LCPs to treat lateral malleolar fractures. Our findings and those in recent publications support the possibility that metallosis can occur not only in patients with arthroplasties, but also in patients with open reduction and internal fixation with LCPs. Surgeons should be aware of such risk of metallosis and be careful to select proper plates for internal fixation.