Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2021 May;152(3):515-522. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03719-5. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Although uncommon, detection of BRAF V600E mutations in adult patients with glioblastoma has become increasingly relevant given the widespread application of molecular diagnostics and encouraging therapeutic activity of BRAF/MEK inhibitors.
We performed a retrospective study of adult glioblastoma patients treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital from January 2011 to July 2019 with an identified BRAF V600E mutation by either immunohistochemistry or molecular testing. Patient characteristics, molecular genomics, and preoperative MRI were analyzed.
Nineteen glioblastoma patients were included, with median age at diagnosis of 41-years-old (range 22-69). Only 1/18 was IDH1/2-mutant; 10/17 had MGMT unmethylated tumors. The most common additional molecular alterations were CDKN2A/2B biallelic loss/loss-of-function (10/13, 76.9%), polysomy 7 (8/12, 66.7%), monosomy 10 (5/12, 41.7%), PTEN biallelic loss/loss-of-function (5/13, 38.5%) and TERT promoter mutations (5/15, 33.3%). Most tumors were well-circumscribed (11/14) and all were contrast-enhancing on MRI. Twelve patients eventually developed subependymal or leptomeningeal dissemination. Six patients were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibition following disease progression after standard of care therapy, with 4/6 patients showing partial response or stable disease as best response. Median time to progression after BRAF/MEK inhibition was 6.0 months (95% CI 1.2-11.8). Grade 1 skin rash was present in 2 patients, but no other adverse events were reported. Median OS for the entire cohort was 24.1 months (95% CI 15.7-38.9).
Understanding the natural history and features of BRAF V600E glioblastoma may help better identify patients for BRAF/MEK inhibition and select therapeutic strategies.
由于分子诊断的广泛应用和 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂令人鼓舞的治疗活性,在 BRAF V600E 突变在成年胶质母细胞瘤患者中的检测变得越来越重要,尽管这种情况并不常见。
我们对 2011 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月期间在 Dana-Farber 癌症研究所/布莱根妇女医院或马萨诸塞州综合医院接受治疗的 BRAF V600E 突变通过免疫组化或分子检测识别的成年胶质母细胞瘤患者进行了回顾性研究。分析了患者特征、分子基因组学和术前 MRI。
19 名胶质母细胞瘤患者被纳入研究,中位诊断年龄为 41 岁(范围 22-69 岁)。仅 1/18 为 IDH1/2 突变型;10/17 为 MGMT 未甲基化肿瘤。最常见的其他分子改变是 CDKN2A/2B 双等位基因缺失/功能丧失(10/13,76.9%)、7 号染色体三体(8/12,66.7%)、10 号染色体单体(5/12,41.7%)、PTEN 双等位基因缺失/功能丧失(5/13,38.5%)和 TERT 启动子突变(5/15,33.3%)。大多数肿瘤边界清楚(11/14),所有肿瘤在 MRI 上均有增强。12 名患者最终发展为室管膜下或软脑膜播散。6 名患者在标准治疗后疾病进展时接受了 BRAF/MEK 抑制治疗,6 名患者中 4 名的最佳反应为部分缓解或疾病稳定。BRAF/MEK 抑制后进展的中位时间为 6.0 个月(95%CI 1.2-11.8)。2 名患者出现 1 级皮疹,但未报告其他不良反应。整个队列的中位 OS 为 24.1 个月(95%CI 15.7-38.9)。
了解 BRAF V600E 胶质母细胞瘤的自然病史和特征可能有助于更好地识别接受 BRAF/MEK 抑制治疗的患者,并选择治疗策略。