Pozzi-Mucelli Roberta A, Furlanis Giovanni, Caruso Paola, Lugnan Carlo, Zdjelar Adrian, Degrassi Ferruccio, Bottaro Lorella, Ukmar Maja, Naccarato Marcello, Manganotti Paolo, Cova Maria A
Radiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences.
Clinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Neurologist. 2021 Mar 4;26(2):41-46. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000315.
Advanced neuroimaging can identify patients who can most benefit from reperfusion treatment, discriminating between ischemic core and penumbra area in a quick and accurate manner. Despite core-penumbra mismatch being an independent prognostic factor, computed tomography perfusion (CTP) assessment is still debated in hyperacute decision-making. The authors aimed to study a novel CTP mismatch score in emergency settings and to investigate its relation with clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).
Neuroimaging and clinical data of 226 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients were analyzed. The study population was divided into 5 different CTP scores: (0) without perfusion deficit, (1) only penumbra, (2) penumbra > core, (3) core ≥ penumbra, (4) only core. For differences in outcome between treated and nontreated patients, and among CTP core-penumbra groups to be assessed, the authors have evaluated the outcome in terms of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
A decrease in NIHSS was statistically greater in IVT-treated patients compared to nontreated patients showing only penumbra (ΔNIHSS%: 80.0% vs. 50.0%; P=0.0023) or no perfusion deficit (ΔNIHSS%: 89.4% vs. 61.5%; P=0.027) on CTP maps. The same trend was found in other groups without significant difference. A significant correlation was found in IVT patients between core/penumbra score and outcome in terms of ΔNIHSS (Kendall τ=-0.19; P=0.004).
The authors proposed a novel immediate CTP assessment to score perfusion mismatch in emergency settings to guide clinicians' decision-making for aggressive treatment and to prevent stroke-related disability.
先进的神经影像学检查能够识别出最能从再灌注治疗中获益的患者,快速且准确地区分缺血核心区和半暗带区域。尽管核心-半暗带不匹配是一个独立的预后因素,但在超急性期决策中,计算机断层扫描灌注(CTP)评估仍存在争议。作者旨在研究一种用于急诊情况下的新型CTP不匹配评分,并探讨其与接受静脉溶栓(IVT)治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者临床结局的关系。
对226例连续的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的神经影像学和临床数据进行分析。研究人群被分为5种不同的CTP评分:(0)无灌注缺损,(1)仅有半暗带,(2)半暗带>核心区,(3)核心区≥半暗带,(4)仅有核心区。为评估治疗患者与未治疗患者之间以及CTP核心-半暗带组之间结局的差异,作者根据出院时的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、改良Rankin量表(mRS)以及症状性脑出血来评估结局。
与未接受治疗且CTP图像显示仅有半暗带(NIHSS变化百分比:80.0%对50.0%;P=0.0023)或无灌注缺损(NIHSS变化百分比:89.4%对61.5%;P=0.027)的患者相比,接受IVT治疗的患者NIHSS的下降在统计学上更显著。在其他组中也发现了相同趋势,但无显著差异。在接受IVT治疗的患者中,核心区/半暗带评分与基于NIHSS变化的结局之间存在显著相关性(Kendall τ=-0.19;P=0.004)。
作者提出了一种用于急诊情况下对灌注不匹配进行评分的新型即时CTP评估方法,以指导临床医生做出积极治疗的决策并预防卒中相关残疾。