Division of Nephrology and Infectious Diseases, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Faculty of Medicine, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Oct 19;37(11):2072-2079. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab060.
In the absence of robust evidence to guide clinical decision-making, the optimal approach to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in haemodialysis (HD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains moot. In this position paper, studies on oral anticoagulation (OAC) in HD patients with AF are highlighted, followed by an evidence-based conclusion, a critical analysis to identify sources of bias and practical opinion-based suggestions on how to manage anticoagulation in this specific population. It remains unclear whether AF is a true risk factor for embolic stroke in HD. The currently employed cut-off values for the CHA2DS2-VASc score do not adequately discriminate dialysis patients deriving a net benefit from those suffering a net harm from OAC. Anticoagulation initiation should probably be more restrictive than currently advocated by official guidelines. Recent evidence reveals that the superior benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) observed in the general population and in moderate chronic kidney disease can be extended to the HD population. VKA may be especially harmful in dialysis patients and should therefore be avoided, in particular in patients with a high bleeding risk and labile international normalized ratio. Dose-finding studies of DOACs suggest that rivaroxaban 10 mg daily and apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily are appropriate choices in dialysis patients. Combined treatment with oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents should be reserved for strong indications and limited in time. Left atrial appendage occlusion is a potential attractive solution to reduce the risk of stroke without increasing bleeding propensity, but it has not been properly studied in dialysis patients.
在缺乏有力证据指导临床决策的情况下,预防血液透析(HD)伴心房颤动(AF)患者卒中及系统性栓塞的最佳方法仍存在争议。本立场文件重点介绍了 AF 合并 HD 患者口服抗凝治疗(OAC)的相关研究,随后提出了基于证据的结论、对偏倚来源的批判性分析以及针对该特殊人群抗凝管理的实际意见建议。AF 是否为 HD 患者发生栓塞性卒中的真正危险因素尚不清楚。目前使用的 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分截断值不能充分区分可从 OAC 中获益和可能因此受害的透析患者。抗凝治疗的起始可能需要比目前的指南更为严格。近期的证据表明,DOAC 相对于维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)在普通人群和中重度慢性肾脏病患者中具有更好的获益-风险比,这一优势在 HD 人群中同样适用。VKA 可能对透析患者尤其有害,因此应避免使用,尤其是在高出血风险和国际标准化比值不稳定的患者中。DOAC 剂量调整研究表明,每日 10mg 利伐沙班和每日 2.5mg 阿哌沙班是透析患者的合理选择。OAC 与抗血小板药物联合治疗应仅保留用于强适应证,并限制其使用时间。左心耳封堵术是一种降低卒中风险而不增加出血倾向的潜在有效方法,但尚未在透析患者中进行充分研究。