Harel Ziv, Smyth Brendan, Badve Sunil V, Blum Daniel, Beaubien-Souligny William, Silver Samuel A, Clark Edward, Suri Rita, Mavrakanas Thomas A, Sasal Joanna, Prasad Bhanu, Eikelboom John, Tennankore Karthik, Rigatto Claudio, Prce Ivana, Madore Francois, Mac-Way Fabrice, Steele Andrew, Zeng Yangmin, Sholzberg Michelle, Dorian Paul, Yan Andrew T, Sood Manish M, Gladstone David J, Tseng Eric, Kitchlu Abhijat, Walsh Michael, Sapir Danny, Oliver Matthew J, Krishnan Murali, Kiaii Mercedeh, Wong Nikki, Kotwal Sradha, Battistella Marisa, Acedillo Rey, Lok Charmaine, Weir Matthew, Wald Ron
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Nephrology, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 May 1;36(5):901-910. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000495. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
Is performing a large definitive trial to establish the optimal anticoagulation strategy in dialysis recipients with atrial fibrillation feasible? One hundred fifty-one patients at 28 dialysis centers were enrolled and randomized to apixaban (=51), warfarin (=52), or no oral anticoagulation (=48). Despite coronavirus disease–related pauses, recruitment was completed in 30 months, with 83% of participants completing follow-up in their assigned treatment arm.
Atrial fibrillation is common in individuals receiving dialysis. The role of oral anticoagulation in this population is uncertain given its exclusion from previous seminal clinical trials. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of performing a large definitive trial to establish the optimal anticoagulation strategy in individuals with atrial fibrillation receiving dialysis.
The Strategies for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Receiving Dialysis trial was a parallel-group, open-label, allocation-concealed, pilot randomized control trial that took place at 28 centers in Canada and Australia. The trial included adults (18 years or older) undergoing dialysis with a history of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who met the CHADS-65 criteria. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive dose-adjusted warfarin, apixaban 5 mg twice daily, or no oral anticoagulation and followed for 26 weeks. The primary outcomes evaluated the following measures of feasibility: () recruitment of the target population within 2 years from the start of the trial and () adherence of >80% of randomized patients to the allocated treatment strategy at the conclusion of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included stroke and bleeding.
From December 2019 to June 2022, 151 patients were enrolled and randomized to apixaban (=51), warfarin (=52), or no oral anticoagulation (=48). Allowing for pauses related to the coronavirus disease pandemic, recruitment was completed in 30 months, and 123 (83%) of participants completed follow-up in their allocated treatment arm. There was one adjudicated stroke event. Eight participants had a major bleeding event (four warfarin, two apixaban, two no oral anticoagulation). Death occurred in 15 participants (nine warfarin, two apixaban, four no oral anticoagulation). Time in the therapeutic range for warfarin recipients was 58% (interquartile range, 47%–70%).
We have demonstrated the feasibility of recruitment and adherence in a trial that compared different anticoagulation strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dialysis.
: Strategies for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Receiving Dialysis (SAFE-D), NCT03987711.
This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2025_04_09_ASN0000000000000495.mp3
开展一项大型确定性试验以确定透析房颤患者的最佳抗凝策略是否可行?28个透析中心的151例患者入组并随机分为阿哌沙班组(n = 51)、华法林组(n = 52)或无口服抗凝组(n = 48)。尽管因冠状病毒病相关原因出现暂停,但在30个月内完成了招募,83%的参与者在其分配的治疗组中完成了随访。
房颤在接受透析的个体中很常见。鉴于其被排除在既往重要临床试验之外,口服抗凝药在该人群中的作用尚不确定。我们的目标是确定开展一项大型确定性试验以确定透析房颤患者最佳抗凝策略的可行性。
接受透析的房颤患者管理策略试验是一项平行组、开放标签、分配隐藏的试点随机对照试验,在加拿大和澳大利亚的28个中心进行。该试验纳入了年龄≥18岁、有非瓣膜性房颤病史且符合CHADS-65标准的透析成年患者。参与者按1:1:1随机分组,分别接受剂量调整的华法林、每日两次5mg阿哌沙班或无口服抗凝治疗,并随访26周。主要结局评估以下可行性指标:(1)从试验开始2年内招募目标人群;(2)随访结束时>80%的随机分组患者坚持分配的治疗策略。次要结局包括卒中与出血。
2019年12月至2022年6月,151例患者入组并随机分为阿哌沙班组(n = 该试验纳入了年龄≥18岁、有非瓣膜性房颤病史且符合CHADS-65标准的透析成年患者。参与者按1:1:1随机分组,分别接受剂量调整的华法林、每日两次5mg阿哌沙班或无口服抗凝治疗,并随访26周。主要结局评估以下可行性指标:(1)从试验开始2年内招募目标人群;(2)随访结束时>80% 的随机分组患者坚持分配的治疗策略。次要结局包括卒中与出血。
2019年12月至2022年6月,151例患者入组并随机分为阿哌沙班组(n = 51)、华法林组(n = 52)或无口服抗凝组(n = 48)。考虑到与冠状病毒病大流行相关的暂停,在30个月内完成了招募,123例(83%)参与者在其分配的治疗组中完成了随访。有1例经判定的卒中事件。8例参与者发生了大出血事件(4例华法林组,2例阿哌沙班组,2例无口服抗凝组)。15例参与者死亡(9例华法林组,2例阿哌沙班组,4例无口服抗凝组)。华法林组患者处于治疗范围内的时间为58%(四分位间距,47% - 70%)。
我们证明了在一项比较透析房颤患者不同抗凝策略的试验中进行招募和坚持治疗的可行性。
接受透析的房颤患者管理策略(SAFE-D),NCT03987711。