Suk Kyung-Soo, Jimenez Kathryn Anne, Jo Je Hyung, Kim Hak-Sun, Lee Hwan-Mo, Moon Seong-Hwan, Lee Byung Ho
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Global Spine J. 2023 Jan;13(1):89-96. doi: 10.1177/2192568221991515. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Prospective observational study.
In ACDF, graft failure and subsidence are common complications of surgery. Depending on the cervical fixation, different biomechanical characteristics are applied on the grafts. This aims to describe the incidence of cervical spacer failure in patients with cervical degenerative condition according to the cervical fixation method and sagittal balance.
From November 2011 to December 2015, 262 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery were enrolled prospectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on fixation method: anterior plate/screw (APS), posterior lateral mass screw (LMS), pedicle screw (PPS) groups. Serial X-rays and CT scans were utilized to evaluate radiologic outcomes.
Mean patient ages were 56.1 years in the APS group, 61.5 years in the LMS group, and 57.6 years in the PPS group ( = 0.002). Allospacer failure was most common in the APS group, compared to the LMS and PPS groups (chi-square, = 0.038). Longer fusion level was associated with greater allospacer failure (Baseline 2 level surgery; Odds ratio (OR) 3.4 in 3 level, 15.2 in 4 level, = 0.036,0.013). Higher T1 slope was correlated with less allospacer failure (OR 0.875, = 0.001). ORs of allospacer failure in the LMS and PPS groups were 0.04 and 0.02, respectively, ( = 0.01, 0.01), compared with the APS group.
This study was able to show that allospacer failure in multi-level ACDF surgery is more common with a longer fusion length, less postoperative T1 slope, and an anterior plate-screws technique. Pedicle screws provided the best biomechanical stability among the 3 constructs.
前瞻性观察性研究。
在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)中,移植物失败和下沉是常见的手术并发症。根据颈椎固定方式的不同,移植物会呈现出不同的生物力学特性。本研究旨在根据颈椎固定方法和矢状面平衡情况,描述颈椎退变患者颈椎椎间融合器失败的发生率。
2011年11月至2015年12月,前瞻性纳入262例行颈椎手术的患者。根据固定方法将患者分为3组:前路钢板/螺钉(APS)组、后路侧块螺钉(LMS)组、椎弓根螺钉(PPS)组。利用系列X线和CT扫描评估影像学结果。
APS组患者平均年龄为56.1岁,LMS组为61.5岁,PPS组为57.6岁(P = 0.002)。与LMS组和PPS组相比,APS组同种异体椎间融合器失败最为常见(卡方检验,P = 0.038)。融合节段越长,同种异体椎间融合器失败的可能性越大(基线2节段手术;3节段的比值比(OR)为3.4,4节段为15.2,P = 0.036,0.013)。T1斜率越高,同种异体椎间融合器失败的可能性越小(OR 0.8,75,P = 0.001)。与APS组相比,LMS组和PPS组同种异体椎间融合器失败的OR分别为0.04和0.02(P = 0.01,0.01)。
本研究表明,在多节段ACDF手术中,同种异体椎间融合器失败在融合长度较长、术后T1斜率较小以及采用前路钢板螺钉技术的情况下更为常见。在这三种固定方式中,椎弓根螺钉提供了最佳的生物力学稳定性。