Division of Pediatric Genetics, Metabolism, and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 5804 Medical Science II, 1241 E. Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5618, USA.
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Mar 1;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00902-5.
Disclosure of pathogenic variants to thoracic aortic dissection biobank participants was implemented. The impact and costs, including confirmatory genetic testing in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory, were evaluated.
We exome sequenced 240 cases with thoracic aortic dissection and 258 controls, then examined 11 aortopathy genes. Pathogenic variants in 6 aortopathy genes (COL3A1, FBN1, LOX, PRKG1, SMAD3, and TGFBR2) were identified in 26 participants, representing 10.8% of the cohort (26/240). A second research sample was used to validate the initial findings. Mailed letters to participants disclosed that a potentially disease causing DNA alteration had been identified (neither the gene nor variant was disclosed). Participants were offered clinical genetic counseling and confirmatory genetic testing in a CLIA laboratory.
Excluding 6 participants who were deceased or lost to follow-up, 20 participants received the disclosure letter, 10 of whom proceeded with genetic counseling, confirmatory genetic testing, and enrolled in a survey study. Participants reported satisfaction with the letter (4.2 ± 0.7) and genetic counseling (4.4 ± 0.4; [out of 5, respectively]). The psychosocial impact was characterized by low decisional regret (11.5 ± 11.6) and distress (16.0 ± 4.2, [out of 100, respectively]). The average cost for 26 participants was $400, including validation and sending letters. The average cost for those who received genetic counseling and CLIA laboratory confirmation was $605.
Participants were satisfied with the return of clinically significant biobank genetic results and CLIA laboratory testing; however, the process required significant time and resources. These findings illustrate the trade-offs involved for researchers considering returning research genetic results.
对胸主动脉夹层生物库参与者进行了致病性变异体的披露。评估了影响和成本,包括在 CLIA 认证实验室进行确认性基因检测。
我们对 240 例胸主动脉夹层患者和 258 例对照进行了外显子组测序,然后检查了 11 个主动脉病基因。在 6 个主动脉病基因(COL3A1、FBN1、LOX、PRKG1、SMAD3 和 TGFBR2)中发现了致病性变异体在 26 名参与者中,占队列的 10.8%(26/240)。第二个研究样本用于验证最初的发现。向参与者邮寄信件,告知他们已发现可能导致疾病的 DNA 改变(既未披露基因也未披露变异体)。参与者可选择接受临床遗传咨询和 CLIA 实验室的确认性基因检测。
排除 6 名死亡或失访的参与者后,有 20 名参与者收到了披露信,其中 10 名参与者接受了遗传咨询、确认性基因检测,并参加了一项调查研究。参与者对信件(4.2±0.7)和遗传咨询(4.4±0.4;分别为 5 分制)表示满意。心理社会影响的特点是决策后悔率低(11.5±11.6)和痛苦程度低(16.0±4.2,分别为 100 分制)。26 名参与者的平均费用为 400 美元,包括验证和发送信件。接受遗传咨询和 CLIA 实验室确认的参与者的平均费用为 605 美元。
参与者对临床意义重大的生物库遗传结果和 CLIA 实验室检测的回报感到满意;然而,该过程需要大量的时间和资源。这些发现说明了考虑回报研究遗传结果的研究人员所面临的权衡。