Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Neb.
University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1436-1448.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.094. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
To evaluate aortic disease progression and reintervention after an initial thoracic aortic dissection in pathogenic variant carriers.
Of 175 participants diagnosed with thoracic aortic dissection, 31 had a pathogenic variant (pathogenic group) across 6 genes (COL3A1, FBN1, LOX, PRKG1, SMAD3, TGFBR2) identified by whole exome sequencing. Those with benign or normal variants (benign/normal group, n = 144) comprised the control group. Clinical data were collected through medical record review (1985-2018) and supplemented with the National Death Index database (December 2018).
The entire cohort (n = 175) consisted of 108 type A aortic dissections and 67 type B aortic dissections, similarly distributed between groups. The pathogenic group was significantly younger (43 vs 56 years, P < .0001) and had significantly more aortic root replacements and similar extents of arch replacement at initial type A aortic dissection repair. The median follow-up time was 7.5 (4.6-12) years. After initial treatment, the pathogenic group required significantly more aortic reinterventions (median 1 vs 0, P < .0001) and mean cumulative aortic reinterventions for each patient (10 years: 1 vs 0.5, P = .029). Both incidence rate (12%/year vs 1.2%/year, P = .0001) and cumulative incidence of reinterventions (9 years: 70% vs 6%, P < .0001) for the preserved native aortic root were significantly higher in the pathogenic group, but were similar for the preserved native aortic arch and distal aorta between groups. Ten-year survival was similar in the pathogenic and benign/normal groups (92% vs 85%).
Aggressive aortic root replacement and similar arch management should be considered in pathogenic variant carriers at initial type A aortic dissection repair compared with benign/normal variant carriers.
评估初始胸主动脉夹层后致病性变异携带者的主动脉疾病进展和再干预情况。
在通过全外显子组测序鉴定的 6 个基因(COL3A1、FBN1、LOX、PRKG1、SMAD3、TGFBR2)的 175 名胸主动脉夹层患者中,有 31 名患者为致病性变异携带者(致病性组)。具有良性或正常变异的患者(良性/正常组,n=144)构成对照组。通过病历回顾(1985-2018 年)收集临床数据,并结合国家死亡指数数据库(2018 年 12 月)进行补充。
整个队列(n=175)包括 108 例 A 型主动脉夹层和 67 例 B 型主动脉夹层,两组分布相似。致病性组明显更年轻(43 岁 vs 56 岁,P<0.0001),初始 A 型主动脉夹层修复时主动脉根部置换术和弓部置换术比例相似。中位随访时间为 7.5(4.6-12)年。初始治疗后,致病性组需要进行更多的主动脉再干预(中位数 1 次 vs 0 次,P<0.0001),每位患者的平均累计主动脉再干预次数(10 年:1 次 vs 0.5 次,P=0.029)。保留的原生主动脉根部的再干预发生率(12%/年 vs 1.2%/年,P=0.0001)和累积再干预发生率(9 年:70% vs 6%,P<0.0001)在致病性组中明显更高,但两组间保留的原生主动脉弓和远端主动脉的再干预发生率相似。致病性组和良性/正常组的 10 年生存率相似(92% vs 85%)。
与良性/正常变异携带者相比,在初始 A 型主动脉夹层修复时,应考虑对致病性变异携带者进行积极的主动脉根部置换术和类似的弓部管理。