• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国公众的议题一致性与党派偏见:重新审视“肆无忌惮的党派人士”论点。

Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the 'partisans without constraint' thesis.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, USA.

Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2021 Feb;94:102498. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102498. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102498
PMID:33648681
Abstract

Prior studies of American polarization suggest that the public gradually sorted themselves into partisan camps in the late 20th century while remaining largely non-ideological. Drawing on more recent data, we reassess these trends and discover a striking increase in the ideological organization of American public opinion in the beginning of the 21st century. Using a broad set of issues from the American National Election Studies, we identify rapid growth in the correlations between political attitudes from 2004 to 2016. This emergence of issue alignment is most pronounced within the economic and civil rights domains, challenging the notion that current "culture wars" are grounded in moral issues. While elite subpopulations show the greatest gains, we find that economic issues become more highly correlated across the electorate. We also find accelerated growth in the association between partisanship and issue attitudes during this period. These findings paint a new picture of the American electorate as not only highly partisan but increasingly ideological.

摘要

先前关于美国极化的研究表明,公众在 20 世纪后期逐渐分为党派阵营,而在很大程度上保持非意识形态化。利用最近的数据,我们重新评估了这些趋势,并发现 21 世纪初美国公众舆论的意识形态组织发生了惊人的变化。我们使用美国全国选举研究中的一系列广泛问题,发现从 2004 年到 2016 年,政治态度之间的相关性迅速增加。这种问题一致性的出现,在经济和公民权利领域最为明显,挑战了当前“文化战争”基于道德问题的观点。虽然精英亚群体的收益最大,但我们发现经济问题在整个选民群体中的相关性越来越高。我们还发现,在此期间,党派关系和问题态度之间的关联也在加速增长。这些发现描绘了一幅新的美国选民图景,他们不仅高度党派化,而且越来越意识形态化。

相似文献

1
Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the 'partisans without constraint' thesis.美国公众的议题一致性与党派偏见:重新审视“肆无忌惮的党派人士”论点。
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Feb;94:102498. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102498. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
2
Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.不受约束的党派人士:美国政治极化与公众舆论趋势
AJS. 2008 Jan 28;114(2):408-446. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1010098.
3
A divided kingdom? Variation in polarization, sorting, and dimensional alignment among the British public, 1986-2018.一个分裂的王国?1986-2018 年英国公众在极化、分类和维度排列上的差异。
Br J Sociol. 2021 Sep;72(4):992-1014. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12873. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
Disclosing political partisanship polarizes first impressions of faces.披露政治党派会使人们对面孔的第一印象产生偏见。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0276400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276400. eCollection 2022.
5
Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.理解生物医学研究辩论中的公众舆论:超越政治党派之争,关注对科学与社会的信念。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088473. eCollection 2014.
6
Partisanship and the Pandemic: How and Why Americans Followed Party Cues on COVID-19.党派之争与大流行:美国人如何以及为何在新冠疫情上追随党派提示。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Jun 1;49(3):351-374. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11066336.
7
Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.感知美国的政治极化:党派认同强度和态度极端性加剧了感知到的党派分歧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569849.
8
The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008-2010: partisanship, self-interest, and racial resentment.2008-2010 年医疗保健意见的动态:党派偏见、自身利益和种族怨恨。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec;36(6):945-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460533.
9
The New Right and family politics.新右派与家庭政治。
Econ Soc. 1992 May;21(2):93-128. doi: 10.1080/03085149200000006.
10
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election.新冠疫情在两极分化政治体制中的影响:2020年选举的教训
Elect Stud. 2022 Dec;80:102548. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102548. Epub 2022 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
How opinion variation among in-groups can skew perceptions of ideological polarization.群体内部的意见差异如何扭曲对意识形态两极分化的认知。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jun 6;4(7):pgaf184. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf184. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts.社会交际背景下政治两极分化的认知动机机制。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(10):560-576. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
3
Belief change in times of crisis: Providing facts about COVID-19-induced inequalities closes the partisan divide but fuels intra-partisan polarization about inequality.
危机时期的信念转变:提供有关 COVID-19 导致不平等的事实可以弥合党派分歧,但会加剧党内对不平等问题的极化。
Soc Sci Res. 2022 May;104:102692. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102692. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
4
The emergence and perils of polarization.极化的出现及其危险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116863118.
5
Interindividual cooperation mediated by partisanship complicates Madison's cure for "mischiefs of faction".党派之争所导致的个体间合作,使麦迪逊针对“派系之争的危害”开出的良方更为复杂。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102148118.