Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Mar;31(3):447-451. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001785.
There has been a contemporary shift in clinical practice towards tailoring treatment in patients with early cervical cancer and low-risk features to non-radical surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the oncologic, fertility, and obstetric outcomes after cervical conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with early stage low-risk cervical cancer.
We conducted a retrospective review in patients with early cervical cancer treated with cervical conization and lymph node assessment between November 2008 and February 2020. Eligibility criteria included patients with a histologic diagnosis of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IA1 with positive lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), stage IA2, or stage IB1 (≤2 cm) with less than two-thirds (<10 mm) cervical stromal invasion.
A total of 44 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 31 years (range 19-61) and 20 patients (45%) were nulliparous. One patient had a 25 mm tumor while the remaining patients had tumors smaller than 20 mm. Eighteen (41%) patients had LVSI. Median follow-up was 44 months (range 6-137). A total of 17 (39%) patients had negative margins on the diagnostic excisional procedure, and none had residual disease on the repeat cone biopsy. Three (6.8%) patients had micrometastases detected in the SLNs and underwent ipsilateral lymphadenectomy; all remaining non-SLN lymph nodes were negative. Six (13.6%) patients required more definitive surgical or adjuvant treatment due to high-risk pathologic features. There were no recurrences documented. Three patients developed cervical stenosis. The live birth rate was 85% and 16 (94%) of 17 patients had live births at term.
Cervical conization with SLN biopsy appears to be a safe treatment option in selected patients with early cervical cancer. Future results of prospective trials may shed definitive light on fertility-sparing options in this group of patients.
临床实践在不断转变,对于具有低危特征的早期宫颈癌患者,倾向于采用非根治性手术来治疗。本研究的目的是评估早期低危宫颈癌患者行宫颈锥切术和前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检后的肿瘤学、生育和产科结局。
我们对 2008 年 11 月至 2020 年 2 月期间接受宫颈锥切术和淋巴结评估的早期宫颈癌患者进行了回顾性研究。入选标准包括组织学诊断为浸润性鳞状细胞癌、腺癌或腺鳞癌、国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)2009 年 IA1 期伴淋巴血管间隙浸润(LVSI)阳性、IA2 期或 IB1 期(≤2cm)且宫颈间质浸润小于三分之二(<10mm)的患者。
共有 44 例患者纳入分析。中位年龄为 31 岁(19-61 岁),20 例(45%)为未产妇。1 例肿瘤大小为 25mm,其余患者肿瘤均小于 20mm。18 例(41%)患者有 LVSI。中位随访时间为 44 个月(6-137 个月)。诊断性切除术中 17 例(39%)患者切缘阴性,重复锥切活检未见残留病灶。3 例(6.8%)患者 SLN 中发现微转移灶,行同侧淋巴结清扫术;其余非 SLN 淋巴结均为阴性。由于存在高危病理特征,6 例(13.6%)患者需要进一步确定性手术或辅助治疗。未记录到复发。3 例患者发生宫颈狭窄。活产率为 85%,17 例患者中有 16 例(94%)足月活产。
对于早期宫颈癌患者,行宫颈锥切术联合 SLN 活检似乎是一种安全的治疗选择。未来前瞻性试验的结果可能会为这组患者提供明确的保留生育力选择。