Suppr超能文献

丹麦的直接面向消费者的基因检测:公众的知识、使用和态度。

Direct to consumer genetic testing in Denmark-public knowledge, use, and attitudes.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Bech-Bruun Law Firm P/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 May;29(5):851-860. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00810-3. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Abstract

Direct to consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) is offered by commercial companies, but the use in the general population has only been sparsely investigated. A questionnaire was sent to 2013 representative Danish citizens asking about their awareness and use of DTC-GT. Individuals who had undergone a genetic test were interviewed to determine if the results had been understood correctly. A pilot study with 2469 questionnaires was performed before this study. In total, 45.4% of the individuals (n = 913/2013) had knowledge about DTC-GT and 2.5% (n = (18 + 5)/913) previously had a genetic test by a private company and 5.8% through the public health care system (n = (48 + 5)/913). Curiosity about own genetic information was the most frequent motivation (40.9%, n = 9/22) as well as knowledge of ancestry (36.4%, n = 8/22) and advice about lifestyle, exercise, or diet (36.4%, n = 8/22). Test of own disease risk was given as a reason in 27.3% (n = 6/22) and seeking possible explanation of specific symptoms in 13.6% (n = 3/22). 50% (n = 11/22) answered that they had become concerned after the test, and 17.4% (n = 4/23) had consulted their GP. Interviews in a subset of respondents from the pilot study revealed problems with understanding the results. One problem was how to interpret the genetic test results with respect to individual risk for a disease. For example, the difference between disease causing genetic variants in monogenetic diseases versus statistical risks by SNPs in multifactorial diseases was not understood by the respondents.

摘要

直接面向消费者的基因检测(DTC-GT)由商业公司提供,但在普通人群中的使用情况研究甚少。我们向 2013 年的丹麦代表性公民发送了一份问卷,询问他们对 DTC-GT 的了解和使用情况。对接受过基因检测的个体进行了访谈,以确定他们是否正确理解了检测结果。在这项研究之前,我们进行了一项包含 2469 份问卷的试点研究。共有 45.4%(n=913/2013)的个体了解 DTC-GT,2.5%(n=(18+5)/913)曾通过私人公司进行过基因检测,5.8%(n=(48+5)/913)通过公共医疗系统进行过基因检测。对自身遗传信息的好奇心是最常见的动机(40.9%,n=9/22),了解祖先(36.4%,n=8/22)和关于生活方式、锻炼或饮食的建议(36.4%,n=8/22)也是常见动机。27.3%(n=6/22)的人将测试自身疾病风险作为一个原因,13.6%(n=3/22)的人寻求特定症状的可能解释。50%(n=11/22)的人回答说他们在检测后感到担忧,17.4%(n=4/23)的人咨询了他们的家庭医生。在试点研究的一组受访者的访谈中,发现了理解结果方面的问题。一个问题是如何根据个体患某种疾病的风险来解释基因检测结果。例如,多基因疾病中致病基因突变与多因素疾病中 SNP 统计风险之间的差异,受访者并不理解。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Lessons Learned from Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.直接面向消费者的基因检测的经验教训。
Clin Lab Med. 2020 Mar;40(1):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.11.005. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.直接面向消费者的基因检测。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 16;367:l5688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5688.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验