EA4660, C3S Laboratory, UPFR Sports, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 31, Chemin de l'Epitaphe, 25000, Besançon, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Jun;121(6):1607-1616. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04640-5. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
This study investigated the effects of force and electromyographic (EMG) feedbacks on forearm muscle activations and handgrip maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC).
Sixteen males performed a set of MIVC in four different feedback conditions: (1) NO-FB: no feedback is given to the participant; (2) FORCE-FB: participants received a visual feedback of the produced force; (3) AGO-FB: participants received a visual feedback of the EMG activity of two agonist grip muscles; (4) ANTAGO-FB: participants received a visual feedback of the EMG activity of two hand extensors muscles. Each feedback was displayed by monitoring the signal of either force or electrical activity of the corresponding muscles.
Compared to NO-FB, FORCE-FB was associated with a higher MIVC force (+ 11%, P < 0.05), a higher EMG activity of agonist and antagonist muscles (+ 8.7% and + 9.2%, respectively, P < 0.05) and a better MIVC/EMG ratio with the agonist muscles (P < 0.05). AGO-FB was associated with a higher EMG activity of agonist muscles (P < 0.05) and ANTAGO-FB was associated with a higher EMG activity of antagonist muscles (P < 0.05). MIVC force was higher in the agonist feedback condition than in the antagonist feedback condition (+ 5.9%, P < 0.05).
Our results showed that the MIVC force can be influenced by different visuals feedback, such as force or EMG feedbacks. Moreover, these results suggested that the type of feedback employed could modify the EMG-to-force relationships. Finally, EMG biofeedback could represent an interesting tool to optimize motor strategies. But in the purpose of performing the highest strength independently of the strategy, the force feedback should be recommended.
本研究旨在探讨力和肌电图(EMG)反馈对前臂肌肉激活和手握最大等长自愿收缩(MIVC)的影响。
16 名男性在四种不同的反馈条件下完成了一组 MIVC:(1)无反馈(NO-FB):不给参与者提供反馈;(2)力反馈(FORCE-FB):参与者接收到产生力的视觉反馈;(3)肌电反馈(AGO-FB):参与者接收到两个主动握肌 EMG 活动的视觉反馈;(4)拮抗肌电反馈(ANTAGO-FB):参与者接收到两个伸腕肌 EMG 活动的视觉反馈。每种反馈都是通过监测相应肌肉的力或电活动信号来显示。
与 NO-FB 相比,FORCE-FB 与更高的 MIVC 力(+11%,P<0.05)、更强的主动肌和拮抗肌的 EMG 活动(分别增加了+8.7%和+9.2%,P<0.05)以及更好的 MIVC/EMG 比值(P<0.05)相关。AGO-FB 与更强的主动肌 EMG 活动(P<0.05)相关,而 ANTAGO-FB 与更强的拮抗肌 EMG 活动(P<0.05)相关。在主动肌反馈条件下的 MIVC 力高于在拮抗肌反馈条件下的 MIVC 力(+5.9%,P<0.05)。
我们的结果表明,MIVC 力可以受到不同视觉反馈(如力或 EMG 反馈)的影响。此外,这些结果表明,所使用的反馈类型可以改变肌电与力的关系。最后,EMG 生物反馈可能是优化运动策略的一个有趣工具。但是,为了独立于策略执行最大力量,应推荐使用力反馈。