Osaka Prefecture University Graduate School of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka, Japan.
Hokutokai Sawa Hospital Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka, Japan.
Psychogeriatrics. 2021 May;21(3):368-377. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12678. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Various types of therapy, including occupational therapy, are utilised for the treatment of moderate to severe dementia. In order to determine the optimal rehabilitation strategy for such patients and examine the treatment efficacy, an assessment scale for engagement in various group activities that can be easily applied in clinical situations is required. We herein report the development of the Assessment Scale for Engagement in Activities (ASEA) and its clinical utility.
The ASEA was developed by nine occupational therapists and a psychiatrist with experience in developing measures for dementia, in accordance with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) checklist. This assessment comprises 10 items covering four domains: Engagement in the Activity, Interaction, Arousal, and Affect. Participants with moderate to severe dementia who resided in a psychiatric acute phase hospital in Japan were assessed in terms of engagement in activities using the ASEA and Todai-shiki Observational Rating Scale (TORS), and in terms of cognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We examined the internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability, content validity, and concurrent validity of the ASEA.
Cronbach's alpha of the ASEA was 0.889. The overall inter-rater reliability was 0.937 (Spearman rank correlation, P < 0.001), and the intraclass correlation (ICC) for each item was 0.490-0.965 (P < 0.018-0.001). The overall test-retest reliability was 0.778 (Spearman's rank correlation, P < 0.001), and the ICC for each item was 0.498-0.863 (P < 0.023-0.001). The test-retest correlations were significant for almost all items, aside from 'Interaction with others' (P = 0.051). The concurrent validity, examined using the TORS and MMSE, was 0.920 and 0.304 (Spearman's rank correlation, P < 0.001-0.006).
The ASEA has confirmed reliability and validity, aside from 'Interaction with others' regarding test-retest reliability. Generally, this assessment tool has clinical utility and allows the evaluation of activity engagement among patients with moderate to severe dementia.
各种类型的疗法,包括职业疗法,都被用于治疗中度至重度痴呆症。为了确定此类患者的最佳康复策略并检查治疗效果,需要一种可用于临床情况的评估量表,用于评估患者参与各种小组活动的情况。我们在此报告用于评估活动参与度的评估量表(ASEA)的开发及其临床应用。
ASEA 由九位具有开发痴呆症评估工具经验的职业治疗师和精神科医生共同制定,符合 COSMIN(健康状况测量工具选择的共识标准)检查表。该评估包括 10 个项目,涵盖四个领域:活动参与度、互动、兴奋度和情感。日本一家精神病急性病房住院的中度至重度痴呆患者使用 AESA 和 Todai-shiki 观察评分量表(TORS)评估活动参与度,使用简易精神状态检查量表(MMSE)评估认知功能。我们检查了 AESA 的内部一致性、评分者间和评分者内信度、内容效度和同时效度。
ASEA 的克朗巴赫 α系数为 0.889。整体评分者间信度为 0.937(Spearman 等级相关,P<0.001),每个项目的组内相关系数(ICC)为 0.490-0.965(P<0.018-0.001)。整体重测信度为 0.778(Spearman 等级相关,P<0.001),每个项目的 ICC 为 0.498-0.863(P<0.023-0.001)。除“与他人互动”(P=0.051)外,几乎所有项目的重测相关性均具有统计学意义。使用 TORS 和 MMSE 评估的同时效度分别为 0.920 和 0.304(Spearman 等级相关,P<0.001-0.006)。
ASEA 的重测信度除外“与他人互动”外,其余项目均具有可靠性和有效性。一般来说,该评估工具具有临床应用价值,可用于评估中度至重度痴呆患者的活动参与度。