Department of Surgery, Foundation University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Department of Radiology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Jan;31(1):S50-S54. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.01.S50.
To measure the outcomes of conservative treatment of acute appendicitis.
Observational study.
Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi from April to July 2020. Methodology: All 58 patients (n=58) presenting with acute appendicitis (AA) were included. Assessment was done with Alvarado score (AS) and ultrasound. Treatment was initiated according to the algorithm corresponding with AS. Those with AS score of 4 or less were started on outpatient oral antibiotics. Patients with AS score of 5 or more were admitted for IV antibiotics. If the symptoms and signs resolved, they were sent home on oral antibiotics to complete a course of 5 days. If their condition did not improve in 72 hours or deteriorated at any time, appendectomy was done. Outcomes were recorded and analysed on SPSS.
Out of 58 patients, 16 were treated with oral, while 42 with IV antibiotics. This yielded a statistically significant difference on the course of disease (p=0.028). Resolution of symptoms was seen in 27.6% (n=16) with conservative management; whereas, 72.4% (n=42) patients needed a subsequent appendectomy. The difference in operative findings between patients, who had been given oral or IV antibiotics was statistically insignificant (p=0.536). Diagnostic value of leukocyte count (TLC), ultrasound and AS was not found to be significant.
Non-operative management is successful in about a quarter of the patients of AA. There is very limited value of sonography, laboratory parameters, or AS in confirming the diagnosis of AA. Key Words: Appendicitis, Conservative treatmen, COVID-19.
评估急性阑尾炎保守治疗的结果。
观察性研究。
2020 年 4 月至 7 月,在拉瓦尔品第的 Fauji 基金会医院。方法:纳入所有 58 例(n=58)急性阑尾炎(AA)患者。评估采用 Alvarado 评分(AS)和超声。根据与 AS 对应的算法开始治疗。AS 评分 4 分或以下的患者开始接受门诊口服抗生素治疗。AS 评分 5 分或以上的患者入院接受静脉抗生素治疗。如果症状和体征缓解,则口服抗生素出院,完成 5 天疗程。如果症状在 72 小时内未改善或随时恶化,则进行阑尾切除术。在 SPSS 上记录和分析结果。
58 例患者中,16 例接受口服治疗,42 例接受静脉抗生素治疗。这在疾病病程方面存在统计学显著差异(p=0.028)。27.6%(n=16)的保守治疗患者症状缓解;而 72.4%(n=42)的患者需要后续阑尾切除术。口服或静脉抗生素治疗患者的手术结果差异无统计学意义(p=0.536)。白细胞计数(TLC)、超声和 AS 的诊断价值不显著。
非手术治疗在约四分之一的 AA 患者中取得成功。超声、实验室参数或 AS 在确认 AA 诊断方面的价值非常有限。关键词:阑尾炎、保守治疗、COVID-19。