Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, NJ, 08560, USA.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Drug Saf. 2021 Apr;44(4):479-497. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01060-4. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Antithrombotic therapies are associated with an increased bleeding risk. Abnormal uterine bleeding data have been reported in clinical trials of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but data are limited for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Using real-world data from four US healthcare databases (October 2010 to December 2018), we compared the occurrence of severe uterine bleeding among women newly exposed to rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and warfarin stratified by indication.
To reduce potential confounding, patients in comparative cohorts were matched on propensity scores. Treatment effect estimates were generated using Cox proportional hazard models for each indication, in each database, and only for pairwise comparisons that met a priori study diagnostics. If estimates were homogeneous (I < 40%), a meta-analysis across databases was performed and pooled hazard ratios reported.
Data from 363,919 women newly exposed to a direct oral anticoagulant or warfarin with a prior diagnosis of AF (60.8%) or VTE (39.2%) were analyzed. Overall incidence of severe uterine bleeding was low in the populations exposed to direct oral anticoagulants, although relatively higher in the younger VTE population vs the AF population (unadjusted incidence rates: 2.8-33.7 vs 1.9-10.0 events/1000 person-years). In the propensity score-matched AF population, a suggestive, moderately increased risk of severe uterine bleeding was observed for rivaroxaban relative to warfarin [hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals from 0.83 (0.27-2.48) to 2.84 (1.32-6.23) across databases with significant heterogeneity], apixaban [pooled hazard ratio 1.45 (0.91-2.28)], and dabigatran [2.12 (1.01-4.43)], which were sensitive to the time-at-risk period. In the propensity score-matched VTE population, a consistent increased risk of severe uterine bleeding was observed for rivaroxaban relative to warfarin [2.03 (1.19-3.27)] and apixaban [2.25 (1.45-3.41)], which were insensitive to the time-at-risk period.
For women who need antithrombotic therapy, personalized management strategies with careful evaluation of benefits and risks are required. CLINICALTRIALS.
NCT04394234; registered in May 2020.
抗血栓治疗与出血风险增加相关。静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者的临床试验报告了异常子宫出血数据,但房颤(AF)患者的数据有限。
使用来自美国四个医疗保健数据库的真实数据(2010 年 10 月至 2018 年 12 月),我们按适应证比较了新接受利伐沙班、阿哌沙班、达比加群和华法林治疗的女性中严重子宫出血的发生情况。
为了减少潜在的混杂因素,比较队列中的患者按倾向评分进行匹配。在每个数据库中,针对每个适应证,仅对符合预先设定研究诊断的配对比较使用 Cox 比例风险模型生成治疗效果估计值。如果估计值具有同质性(I < 40%),则对数据库进行荟萃分析,并报告合并危险比。
分析了 363919 名新接受直接口服抗凝剂或华法林治疗且既往有 AF(60.8%)或 VTE(39.2%)诊断的女性的数据。直接口服抗凝剂治疗的人群中严重子宫出血的总体发生率较低,尽管在年轻的 VTE 人群中相对较高,而非 AF 人群中则较低(未经调整的发生率:2.8-33.7 vs 1.9-10.0 事件/1000 人年)。在倾向评分匹配的 AF 人群中,与华法林相比,利伐沙班治疗的严重子宫出血风险呈中度增加趋势,但具有显著异质性(来自数据库的风险比和 95%置信区间为 0.83(0.27-2.48)至 2.84(1.32-6.23)),阿哌沙班[风险比 1.45(0.91-2.28)]和达比加群[2.12(1.01-4.43)],这对风险期敏感。在倾向评分匹配的 VTE 人群中,与华法林相比,利伐沙班和阿哌沙班治疗的严重子宫出血风险一致增加(利伐沙班 2.03(1.19-3.27),阿哌沙班 2.25(1.45-3.41)),对风险期不敏感。
对于需要抗血栓治疗的女性,需要制定个体化的管理策略,仔细评估利弊。临床试验。
NCT04394234;2020 年 5 月登记。