• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体育赛事中多组分酒精预防干预的效果:一项准实验对照研究。

Effects of a multi-component alcohol prevention intervention at sporting events: a quasi-experimental control group study.

机构信息

STAD (Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

Prevention Research Center, PIRE (Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation), Oakland, Berkeley, California, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2663-2672. doi: 10.1111/add.15461. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/add.15461
PMID:33651434
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Alcohol intoxication among spectators and related problems are common at sporting events. This study estimated the impact a multi-component community-based alcohol prevention intervention, implemented at Swedish Premier Football (soccer) League matches, had on intoxication levels among spectators and refusal rates of alcohol service to, and arena entry of, obviously intoxicated spectators.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental controlled study using a repeated cross-sectional design.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Spectators and sport arenas in Stockholm and Gothenburg, Sweden.

INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR

The intervention was implemented in Stockholm and consisted of community mobilisation and collaboration, training of staff and improved enforcement and policy work. Gothenburg was the comparison area and received usual care.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes were spectators' mean breath alcohol concentration (BrAC), proportion of spectators with high intoxication levels, (defined as BrAC ≥0.1%), overserving at licensed premises inside arenas and refused arena entry of obviously intoxicated spectators. Baseline data were collected during 2015 and follow-up during 2016 and 2017.

FINDINGS

BrAC assessments (n = 10 188), arena entry attempts (n = 201) and alcohol purchase attempts at premises inside arenas (n = 495) were collected. There was evidence that the refusal rates of alcohol purchase at premises inside arenas improved differently between study areas and over time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.07, 1.06, P = 0.060, Bayes factor [BF] = 8.60). In both study areas, the arena entry refusal rates improved over time (aOR = 5.87, 95% CI = 1.16, 29.83, P = 0.033, BF = 17.7), but evidence that the rates improved differently between study areas and over time was equivocal (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.09, 3.56, P = 0.543, BF = 1.2). Mean BrAC levels decreased over time in both study areas (β = -0.032, 95% CI = -0.050, -0.015, P < 0.001), and differently (β = 0.104, 95% CI = 0.061, 0.146, P < 0.001), but evidence for an interaction effect was equivocal (β = -0.002, 95% CI = -0.022, 0.018, P = 0.868, BF = 1.0). Evidence was equivocal regarding whether the proportion of spectators with high intoxication levels decreased differently between study areas and over time (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.91, 1.50, P = 0.220, BF = 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-component community-based alcohol prevention intervention at sporting events may have increased staff intervention toward obviously intoxicated spectators. It was not clear whether this translated into a reduction in intoxication, which can be explained by improvements in the comparison area.

摘要

背景与目的

观众的酒精中毒和相关问题在体育赛事中很常见。本研究评估了一项基于社区的多组分酒精预防干预措施对瑞典足球超级联赛比赛中观众的醉酒水平以及拒绝为醉酒观众提供酒精服务和禁止其进入体育场馆的影响。

设计

使用重复横截面设计的准实验对照研究。

地点和参与者

瑞典斯德哥尔摩和哥德堡的观众和体育场馆。

干预和对照组

该干预措施在斯德哥尔摩实施,包括社区动员和协作、员工培训以及加强执法和政策工作。哥德堡是对照组,接受常规护理。

测量

主要结局指标是观众的平均呼气酒精浓度(BrAC)、高醉酒水平(定义为 BrAC≥0.1%)的观众比例、在场地内许可场所的过量供应和拒绝明显醉酒观众进入场馆。基线数据收集于 2015 年,随访于 2016 年和 2017 年。

发现

共收集了 10188 次 BrAC 评估、201 次场馆入口尝试和 495 次场馆内场所的酒精购买尝试。有证据表明,研究区域和随时间的推移,场馆内场所的拒绝购买酒精的比率不同(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 0.28,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.07,1.06,P = 0.060,贝叶斯因子[BF] = 8.60)。在两个研究区域,场馆入口拒绝率随时间推移而提高(aOR = 5.87,95%CI = 1.16,29.83,P = 0.033,BF = 17.7),但证据表明研究区域和随时间的变化,拒绝率的改善情况存在不确定性(aOR = 0.57,95%CI = 0.09,3.56,P = 0.543,BF = 1.2)。两个研究区域的平均 BrAC 水平随时间推移而降低(β= -0.032,95%CI = -0.050,-0.015,P < 0.001),且不同(β= 0.104,95%CI = 0.061,0.146,P < 0.001),但交互效应的证据存在不确定性(β= -0.002,95%CI = -0.022,0.018,P = 0.868,BF = 1.0)。关于高醉酒水平观众的比例是否在研究区域和随时间的变化上存在不同的减少,证据存在不确定性(aOR = 1.17,95%CI = 0.91,1.50,P = 0.220,BF = 2.2)。

结论

在体育赛事中实施基于社区的多组分酒精预防干预措施可能增加了工作人员对明显醉酒观众的干预。醉酒程度没有明显下降,这可以解释为对照组的情况有所改善。

相似文献

1
Effects of a multi-component alcohol prevention intervention at sporting events: a quasi-experimental control group study.体育赛事中多组分酒精预防干预的效果:一项准实验对照研究。
Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2663-2672. doi: 10.1111/add.15461. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Alcohol prevention at sporting events: study protocol for a quasi-experimental control group study.体育赛事中的酒精预防:一项准实验对照组研究的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 6;16:471. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3145-3.
3
Overserving and Allowed Entry of Obviously Alcohol-Intoxicated Spectators at Sporting Events.体育赛事中过度观察和允许明显醉酒观众进入。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Feb;42(2):444-452. doi: 10.1111/acer.13563. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
Alcohol intoxication at Swedish football matches: A study using biological sampling to assess blood alcohol concentration levels among spectators.瑞典足球比赛中的酒精中毒现象:一项利用生物样本检测评估观众血液酒精浓度水平的研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 20;12(11):e0188284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188284. eCollection 2017.
5
Drink Less Enjoy More: effects of a multi-component intervention on improving adherence to, and knowledge of, alcohol legislation in a UK nightlife setting.少喝多享受:多组分干预对改善英国夜生活环境中酒精立法的依从性和知识的影响。
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1420-1429. doi: 10.1111/add.14223. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
6
Long-term effects of an alcohol prevention program at licensed premises: a Swedish 20-year follow-up study.持牌场所的酒精预防计划的长期效果:瑞典 20 年随访研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;12:1423708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423708. eCollection 2024.
7
Too drunk for a beer? A study of overserving in Stockholm.醉到喝不下一杯啤酒?斯德哥尔摩过度服务现象研究。
Addiction. 2002 Jul;97(7):901-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00160.x.
8
Compliance to the Alcohol Law: Overserving to Obviously Intoxicated Visitors at Music Festivals.遵守《酒精法》:音乐节向明显醉酒的访客过度提供酒水。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(22):8699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228699.
9
Public opinion on alcohol consumption and intoxication at Swedish professional football events.瑞典职业足球赛事中关于饮酒与醉酒的公众舆论。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 May 8;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0103-8.
10
Overserving at licensed premises in Stockholm: effects of a community action program.在斯德哥尔摩的持牌场所过度服务:一项社区行动计划的效果
J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Nov;66(6):806-14. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.806.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term effects of an alcohol prevention program at licensed premises: a Swedish 20-year follow-up study.持牌场所的酒精预防计划的长期效果:瑞典 20 年随访研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;12:1423708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423708. eCollection 2024.
2
Sales to Apparently Intoxicated Customers in Three States With Different Histories of Responsible Beverage Service Training.三个州对貌似醉酒顾客的销售情况,这三个州有着不同的负责任的酒水服务培训历史。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 May;85(3):312-321. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00258. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Effects of multi-component programmes in preventing sales of alcohol to intoxicated patrons in nightlife settings in the United Kingdom.
多组分项目对英国夜生活场所向醉酒顾客售酒行为的预防效果。
Addict Behav Rep. 2022 Mar 21;15:100422. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100422. eCollection 2022 Jun.