Quigg Zara, Butler Nadia, Hughes Karen, Bellis Mark A
World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Violence Prevention, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Investment for Health and Well-being, Public Health Wales, Wrexham, UK.
Addict Behav Rep. 2022 Mar 21;15:100422. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100422. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Alcohol service to intoxicated patrons is common across nightlife settings and preventing such sales is a key priority globally. In England and Wales, three multi-component programmes have been implemented including: (1) community mobilisation, responsible beverage server (RBS) training and routine law enforcement; (2) community mobilisation and enhanced law enforcement; and, (3) community mobilisation, RBS training and enhanced law enforcement. This study estimates the association between sales of alcohol to pseudo-intoxicated patrons and implementation of three multi-component interventions in four nightlife settings.
Alcohol test purchases by pseudo-intoxicated actors were implemented at pre (n = 206) and post-intervention (n = 224). Actors/observers recorded venue and test purchase characteristics. Logistic regression assessed service refusal by intervention type, adjusting for venue/test purchase characteristics.
Pre-intervention, 20.9% of sales were refused. Post-intervention, 42.1%, 68.8% and 74.0% of sales were refused in areas with intervention 1, 2, and 3 respectively. In adjusted analyses, compared to pre-intervention, the odds of service refusal were higher for all interventions, with the highest odds when the intervention included enhanced law enforcement (adjusted odds ratios, interventions 1, 2, 3: 2.6, 7.1, 14.4; p < 0.01). Service refusal was higher if the test purchase was implemented on a Saturday/Sunday night; and lower if implemented in a nightclub or if age verification was requested at the bar.
Community-based multi-component interventions were associated with significant increases in service refusal to pseudo-intoxicated actors in nightlife settings in England and Wales. Effects were stronger for interventions including enhanced law enforcement, and particularly if all intervention components were implemented.
向醉酒顾客提供酒精饮料在夜生活场所很常见,防止此类销售是全球的一项关键优先事项。在英格兰和威尔士,已经实施了三个多组分项目,包括:(1)社区动员、责任饮料服务人员(RBS)培训和常规执法;(2)社区动员和强化执法;以及(3)社区动员、RBS培训和强化执法。本研究估计了向伪装醉酒顾客销售酒精饮料与在四个夜生活场所实施的三种多组分干预措施之间的关联。
由伪装醉酒的参与者进行酒精测试购买,在干预前(n = 206)和干预后(n = 224)进行。参与者/观察者记录场所和测试购买的特征。逻辑回归按干预类型评估服务拒绝情况,并对场所/测试购买特征进行调整。
干预前,20.9%的销售被拒绝。干预后,在实施干预1、2和3的地区,分别有42.1%、68.8%和74.0%的销售被拒绝。在调整分析中,与干预前相比,所有干预措施的服务拒绝几率都更高,当干预措施包括强化执法时几率最高(调整后的优势比,干预措施1、2、3:2.6、7.1、14.4;p < 0.01)。如果测试购买在周六/周日晚上进行,服务拒绝率更高;如果在夜总会进行或酒吧要求进行年龄验证,则服务拒绝率更低。
在英格兰和威尔士的夜生活场所,基于社区的多组分干预措施与对伪装醉酒参与者的服务拒绝显著增加相关。包括强化执法的干预措施效果更强,特别是如果所有干预组分都得到实施。