Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Policy Research and International Development Directorate, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1420-1429. doi: 10.1111/add.14223. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
To estimate the association between implementation of a community-based multi-component intervention (Drink Less Enjoy More) and sales of alcohol to pseudo-intoxicated patrons and nightlife patron awareness of associated legislation.
Cross-sectional pre-intervention and follow-up measurements, including alcohol test purchases (using pseudo-intoxicated patrons) in licensed premises (stratified random sample; 2013, 2015) and a survey with nightlife patrons (convenience sample; 2014, 2015).
One UK municipality with a large night-time economy.
Licensed premises (pre = 73; follow-up = 100); nightlife patrons (pre = 214; follow-up = 202).
The Drink Less Enjoy More intervention included three interacting components: community mobilization and awareness-raising; responsible bar server training; and active law enforcement of existing legislation prohibiting sales of alcohol to, and purchasing of alcohol for, a person who appears to be alcohol intoxicated: 'intoxicated', herein for economy.
The primary outcomes were alcohol service refusal to pseudo-intoxicated patrons and nightlife patron knowledge of alcohol legislation (illegal to sell alcohol to, and purchase alcohol for, intoxicated people), adjusted for potential confounders including characteristics of the area, venue, test purchase and nightlife patron.
Pre-intervention, 16.4% of alcohol sales were refused, compared with 74.0% at follow-up (P < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, the odds of service refusal were higher at follow-up [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 14.63, P < 0.001]. Service refusal was also associated with server gender and patron drunkenness within the venue. Among drinkers, accurate awareness of alcohol legislation was higher at follow-up (sales: pre = 44.5%; follow-up = 66.0%; P < 0.001/purchase: pre = 32.5%; follow-up = 56.0%; P < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, knowledge of legislation was higher at follow-up (sales: aOR = 2.73, P < 0.001; purchasing: aOR = 2.73, P < 0.001). Knowledge of legislation was also associated with participant age (purchasing) and expectations of intoxication (sales).
A community-based multi-component intervention concerning alcohol sales legislation in the United Kingdom (UK) was associated with a reduction in sales of alcohol to pseudo-intoxicated patrons in on-licensed premises in a UK nightlife setting and an improvement in nightlife patron awareness of associated legislation.
评估基于社区的多组分干预(少喝多享受)的实施与向佯装醉酒顾客销售酒精以及夜生活顾客对相关立法的认知之间的关联。
预干预和随访测量的横断面研究,包括在持牌场所进行的酒精测试购买(使用佯装醉酒顾客)(分层随机抽样;2013 年,2015 年)和对夜生活顾客进行的调查(便利抽样;2014 年,2015 年)。
一个夜间经济发达的英国城市。
持牌场所(预=73;随访=100);夜生活顾客(预=214;随访=202)。
少喝多享受干预措施包括三个相互作用的组成部分:社区动员和提高认识;负责任的酒吧服务员培训;以及积极执法,禁止向佯装醉酒顾客销售和为佯装醉酒顾客购买酒精:“醉酒”,此处为经济目的。
主要结果是拒绝向佯装醉酒顾客提供酒精服务和夜生活顾客对酒精立法的了解(禁止向醉酒顾客销售和为醉酒顾客购买酒精),调整了包括地区、场所、测试购买和夜生活顾客特征在内的潜在混杂因素。
干预前,16.4%的酒精销售被拒绝,而随访时为 74.0%(P<0.001)。在调整后的分析中,随访时拒绝服务的可能性更高[调整后的优势比(aOR)=14.63,P<0.001]。服务拒绝还与服务员性别和场所内顾客醉酒程度有关。在饮酒者中,随访时对酒精立法的准确认识更高(销售:预=44.5%;随访=66.0%;P<0.001/购买:预=32.5%;随访=56.0%;P<0.001)。在调整后的分析中,随访时对立法的认识更高(销售:aOR=2.73,P<0.001;购买:aOR=2.73,P<0.001)。对立法的认识也与参与者年龄(购买)和醉酒预期有关(销售)。
英国(英国)一项关于酒精销售立法的基于社区的多组分干预措施与减少向英国夜生活场所持牌场所佯装醉酒顾客销售酒精以及提高夜生活顾客对相关立法的认识有关。