Suppr超能文献

[阿姆斯特丹腕部损伤诊断规则应用程序:腕部创伤患者分诊的辅助工具]

[The Amsterdam Wrist Rules app: An aid for the triage of patients with wrist trauma].

作者信息

Salentijn Dorien A, Mulders Marjolein A M, van Veen Ruben N, Goslings J Carel, Schep Niels W L

机构信息

Maasstad Ziekenhuis, afd. Chirurgie, Rotterdam.

Contact: Dorien A. Salentijn (

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020 Dec 17;164:D5198.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of implementing the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) during Emergency Department (ED) nurse triage, and to assess the potential reduction of radiographic images.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study METHODS: Based on patient characteristics and clinical variables the AWR-application advised triage nurses if radiographic imaging was necessary of patients (>3 years) presenting with trauma of the wrist. The triage nurse was allowed to perform radiographic imaging if the advice was negative. Safety was assessed by the number of missed clinically relevant distal radius fractures (DRFs) when the AWR advised not to perform imaging. The potential reduction of radiographic images was assessed by the proportion of patients in whom the AWR-application advised not to perform imaging. Compliance was defined as following this advice. Patient satisfaction was assessed if no radiographic imaging was performed.

RESULTS

The AWR-application advised not to perform imaging in 18% of children (n=153) and in 9% of adults (n=204). In children, one clinically relevant DRF was missed (sensitivity 99%, specificity 33%) and none in adults (sensitivity 100%, specificity 19%). The compliance was 22% in children and 32% in adults. If no radiographic imaging was performed, 100% of children and 75% of adults were satisfied.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the AWR during ED nurse triage of patients presenting with wrist trauma can safely contribute to reducing unnecessary radiographic imaging. If other injuries than a clinically relevant DRF are suspected based on triage, an ED physician should decide if imaging is necessary.

摘要

目的

评估在急诊科护士分诊过程中应用阿姆斯特丹腕部规则(AWR)的安全性,并评估X线影像检查潜在的减少情况。

设计

前瞻性队列研究

方法

根据患者特征和临床变量,AWR应用程序会告知分诊护士手腕创伤患者(>3岁)是否需要进行X线影像检查。如果建议为阴性,分诊护士可以进行X线影像检查。当AWR建议不进行影像检查时,通过漏诊的临床相关桡骨远端骨折(DRF)数量评估安全性。通过AWR应用程序建议不进行影像检查的患者比例评估X线影像检查潜在的减少情况。依从性定义为遵循该建议。如果未进行X线影像检查,则评估患者满意度。

结果

AWR应用程序建议18%的儿童(n = 153)和9%的成人(n = 204)不进行影像检查。在儿童中,漏诊1例临床相关的DRF(敏感性99%,特异性33%),成人中未漏诊(敏感性100%,特异性19%)。儿童的依从性为22%,成人的依从性为32%。如果未进行X线影像检查,100%的儿童和75%的成人表示满意。

结论

在急诊科对腕部创伤患者进行护士分诊时应用AWR可以安全地减少不必要的X线影像检查。如果根据分诊怀疑除临床相关DRF外还有其他损伤,急诊科医生应决定是否需要进行影像检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验