Gregg Edward W., Menke Andy
Dr. Edward W. Gregg is Chief of the Epidemiology and Statistics Branch in the Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Dr. Andy Menke is a Senior Research Analyst at Social & Scientific Systems, Inc., Silver Spring, MD
This chapter reviews findings from national studies of prevention of and trends in diabetes-related disability, summarizes the modifiable risk factors and mechanisms for the excess disability prevalence associated with diabetes, and reviews evidence that physical disability can be prevented or modified. Cross-sectional and prospective studies have consistently found persons with diabetes to have 50%–90% increased risk of several domains of disability, including mobility loss, reduced instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) or basic activities of daily living (ADL), and work disability. The association of diabetes with increased disability risk is likely multifactorial, with obesity, coronary heart disease, lower extremity diseases, depression, and stroke among the most consistently observed factors explaining the difference in disability risk between people with and without diabetes. Additionally, several studies have suggested that specific physiological factors, including inflammation, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and sarcopenia, may also mediate the higher diabetes-related disability risk. In nationally representative analyses conducted for , 40% of diabetic women and 25% of diabetic men reported major mobility disability, about one-fourth of diabetic adults reported work disability, and one-tenth reported IADL disability. When disability prevalence was expressed as either disability or impairments, more than one-third of men were impacted in work (36%) and mobility (44%), almost one-fourth (23%) were impacted in IADL, and 14% were impacted in ADL. Among older adults (ages 65–74 and ≥75 years), prevalences of mobility disability, IADL, and work disability were generally similar among those with normal glucose, prediabetes, and undiagnosed diabetes but were appreciably higher among those with diagnosed diabetes. Among middle-aged adults (age 45–64 years), the association between glucose classification and disability risk was more continuous, with successively higher disability prevalences across those with normal glucose, prediabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, diabetes duration <15 years, and duration ≥15 years. The percentage of adults with diagnosed diabetes reporting limitations in mobility, IADL, and ADL tended to decline between 1997 and 2000 but remained largely unchanged between 2000 and 2011 for all age strata. The percentage of diabetic adults reporting work disability declined from 23.8% in 1997 to a low of 17.9% in 2006, increasing to 19.7% in 2011. Lifestyle interventions, including weight loss with physical activity, have emerged as particularly promising approaches to reduce diabetes-related disability. However, further research is needed to determine the impact of other preventive care and diabetes management practices on disability risk, and continued surveillance is needed to determine the impact of primary and secondary prevention approaches on disability risk in the coming decades.
本章回顾了全国性糖尿病相关残疾预防研究的结果及趋势,总结了与糖尿病相关的可改变的残疾流行率过高的风险因素和机制,并回顾了身体残疾可预防或改善的证据。横断面研究和前瞻性研究一致发现,糖尿病患者在多个残疾领域的风险增加了50%至90%,包括行动能力丧失、日常生活工具性活动(IADL)或日常生活基本活动(ADL)减少以及工作残疾。糖尿病与残疾风险增加之间的关联可能是多因素的,肥胖、冠心病、下肢疾病、抑郁症和中风是最常观察到的因素,解释了糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者之间残疾风险的差异。此外,多项研究表明,包括炎症、胰岛素抵抗、高血糖和肌肉减少症在内的特定生理因素,也可能介导较高的糖尿病相关残疾风险。在针对全国代表性样本进行的分析中,40%的糖尿病女性和25%的糖尿病男性报告有严重行动残疾,约四分之一的糖尿病成年人报告有工作残疾,十分之一报告有IADL残疾。当用残疾或损伤来表示残疾流行率时,超过三分之一的男性在工作(36%)和行动能力(44%)方面受到影响,近四分之一(23%)在IADL方面受到影响,14%在ADL方面受到影响。在老年人(65至74岁及≥75岁)中,血糖正常、糖尿病前期和未诊断糖尿病患者的行动残疾、IADL和工作残疾流行率总体相似,但在已诊断糖尿病患者中明显更高。在中年成年人(45至64岁)中,血糖分类与残疾风险之间的关联更为连续,血糖正常、糖尿病前期、未诊断糖尿病、糖尿病病程<15年和病程≥15年的人群中,残疾流行率依次升高。1997年至2000年期间,报告在行动能力、IADL和ADL方面有局限的已诊断糖尿病成年人的比例趋于下降,但在2000年至2011年期间,所有年龄层的这一比例基本保持不变。报告有工作残疾的糖尿病成年人比例从1997年的23.8%降至2006年的最低点17.9%,2011年又升至19.7%。包括通过体育活动减轻体重在内的生活方式干预,已成为降低糖尿病相关残疾的特别有前景的方法。然而,需要进一步研究以确定其他预防保健和糖尿病管理措施对残疾风险的影响,并且需要持续监测以确定一级和二级预防方法在未来几十年对残疾风险的影响。