Graduate Program of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brazil.
School of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, KY, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021 Sep;46(9):1029-1037. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0900. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dynamic (DRT) and isometric (IRT) resistance training on glycemic homeostasis, lipid profile, and nitric oxide (NO) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups: control ( = 65), DRT ( = 65), and IRT ( = 67). Patients assessed before and after the intervention period were tested for fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, oral glucose tolerance test, insulin resistance, lipid profile, leptin, insulin, adiponectin, C-reactive protein, and NO . Patients underwent to strength and body composition assessments. Subjects allocated in both DRT and IRT groups took part in a 24-week resistance training program, 3 times per week. Each training session was approximately 1 hour before dialysis and consisted of 3 sets of 8-12 repetitions at low intensity. Total workload was higher in the DRT as compared with the IRT. This heightened workload related to better glycemic homeostasis in HD patients as measured by regulation of insulin, adiponectin, and leptin, while improveing triglycerides, free-fat mass, and muscle strength. Additionally, NO levels were increased in the DRT group. NO was significantly correlated with glucose intolerance ( = -0.42, = 0.0155) and workload ( = 0.46, = 0.0022). The IRT group only improved strength ( < 0.05). Twenty-four weeks of DRT improved glycemic homeostasis, lipid profile, and NO in HD patients. Although IRT seems to play an important role in increasing strength, DRT might be a better choice to promote metabolic adjustments in HD patients. Clinical trial: http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-3gpg5w. DRT might be a better choice for metabolic improvements in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Exercise-training might treat metabolic imbalance in CKD patients.
这项研究的目的是比较动态阻力训练(DRT)和等长阻力训练(IRT)对血液透析(HD)患者血糖稳态、血脂谱和一氧化氮(NO)的影响。患者被随机分为 3 组:对照组(n=65)、DRT 组(n=65)和 IRT 组(n=67)。干预前后评估的患者接受空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、口服葡萄糖耐量试验、胰岛素抵抗、血脂谱、瘦素、胰岛素、脂联素、C 反应蛋白和 NO 检测。患者接受力量和身体成分评估。DRT 和 IRT 两组的受试者均参加了为期 24 周的阻力训练计划,每周 3 次。每次训练课程大约在透析前 1 小时进行,包括低强度的 3 组 8-12 次重复。DRT 的总工作量高于 IRT。这种增加的工作量与 HD 患者的血糖稳态调节有关,表现为胰岛素、脂联素和瘦素的调节,同时改善甘油三酯、游离脂肪质量和肌肉力量。此外,DRT 组的 NO 水平增加。NO 与葡萄糖耐量呈显著负相关(r=-0.42,P=0.0155),与工作量呈显著正相关(r=0.46,P=0.0022)。IRT 组仅改善了力量(P<0.05)。24 周的 DRT 改善了 HD 患者的血糖稳态、血脂谱和 NO。尽管 IRT 似乎在增加力量方面发挥了重要作用,但 DRT 可能是改善 HD 患者代谢的更好选择。临床试验:http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-3gpg5w。DRT 可能是改善慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者代谢的更好选择。运动训练可能会治疗 CKD 患者的代谢失衡。