Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Deusto Business School, University of Deusto, Deusto, Spain.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0246576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246576. eCollection 2021.
The glass cliff suggests that women are more likely to access leadership positions when organizations are facing a crisis. Although this phenomenon is well established, it is still largely unknown how variations in types of crises influence the strength of the think crisis-think female association, and whether female leaders and leaders with communal gendered traits are both affected by this association. We hypothesized that selection of stereotypically feminine traits (communal leaders) is specific to a relational crisis because of a fit between leader traits and traits required by the situation. We further expected that the selection of women also extends to other crisis situations because other factors such as their signaling change potential may play a role. We investigated the associations that participants made with candidates who varied across gendered traits and gender and between two crisis situations involving problems with either stereotypically feminine (e.g., an internal disharmony) or masculine (e.g., a financial problem) components, and a no crisis situation control. Results from three experimental studies (Ns = 319, 384, 385) supported our hypotheses by showing that communal leaders were most strongly associated with a relational crisis and least with a financial crisis, with the no crisis context situated in-between. This pattern was explained by higher relevance ratings for communal leadership behavior in the relational crisis versus financial crisis context, with the no crisis context situated in-between. In contrast, female leaders were most strongly associated with the relational crisis and least with the no crisis context, with the financial crisis situated in-between. Specific explanatory mechanisms related to the female-crisis association are explored and discussed. Our findings suggest that implicit motivations for valuing feminine/communal leadership and atypical leaders in crisis situations need further research.
玻璃悬崖表明,当组织面临危机时,女性更有可能获得领导职位。尽管这种现象已经得到很好的证实,但人们对不同类型的危机如何影响危机思维与女性关联的强度,以及女性领导者和具有共通性别特征的领导者是否都受到这种关联的影响,知之甚少。我们假设,选择典型的女性特质(共通型领导者)是与关系危机相关的,因为领导者特质与情境所需的特质之间存在契合。我们进一步预期,对女性的选择也会扩展到其他危机情境,因为其他因素,如她们的变革潜力信号,可能会发挥作用。我们研究了参与者在两种危机情境(涉及典型女性特质的问题,如内部不和谐;或典型男性特质的问题,如财务问题)和一个无危机情境之间,与具有性别特质和性别的候选人之间的关联。结果来自三项实验研究(N=319、384、385)支持了我们的假设,表明共通型领导者与关系危机的关联最强,与财务危机的关联最弱,而无危机情境则处于中间位置。这种模式可以通过以下方式来解释:在关系危机情境中,共通型领导行为的相关性评价更高,而在财务危机情境中则更低,无危机情境则处于中间位置。相比之下,女性领导者与关系危机的关联最强,与无危机情境的关联最弱,而财务危机则处于中间位置。探讨和讨论了与女性-危机关联相关的具体解释机制。我们的研究结果表明,需要进一步研究在危机情境中隐含地重视女性/共通领导和非典型领导者的动机。