Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2742-2750.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.031. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
There is limited information about outcomes associated with stopping asthma biologics.
To compare outcomes in people who stopped or continued asthma biologics.
We identified a cohort of people with asthma who stopped or continued asthma biologics in the Optum Labs Database Warehouse, using a propensity matching method for case and control groups with the variables of age, sex, race, region, insurance, income, specialist access, Charlson comorbidity, specific medical conditions, pre-index exacerbation count, pre-index rescue inhaler pharmacy fills, and pre-index inhaled corticosteroid with or without long-acting β-agonist pharmacy fills. Primary outcome used to assess failure of stopping was an increase of 50% or more in the asthma exacerbation rate in the 6 months after discontinuing the biologic compared with the 6-month period before biologic initiation.
Among a cohort of 4960 asthma biologic users, 1249 were observed to stop use after 6 to 12 months of use. We identified a matched cohort of 1247 stoppers and 1247 people who continued biologic use for at least 18 months. In the first 6 months after stopping or sham stopping, 10.2% of stoppers and 9.5% of continuers had an increase of 50% or more in asthma exacerbations. We found a similar adjusted odds of failing among stoppers and continuers (odds ratio = 1.085; 95% confidence interval, 0.833-1.413).
An increase in asthma exacerbations is infrequently observed in people who stopped asthma biologics and was observed at similar rates as in matched controls who continued asthma biologics.
关于停止使用哮喘生物制剂相关结果的信息有限。
比较停止或继续使用哮喘生物制剂患者的结局。
我们使用倾向匹配法,根据年龄、性别、种族、地区、保险、收入、专科医生就诊情况、Charlson 合并症指数、具体医疗状况、索引前加重次数、索引前急救吸入器药物使用情况、索引前吸入皮质激素与或不与长效β-激动剂药物使用情况,在 Optum Labs 数据库仓库中确定了一个停止或继续使用哮喘生物制剂的哮喘患者队列。用于评估停药失败的主要结局是与生物制剂起始前的 6 个月相比,停药后 6 个月内哮喘加重率增加 50%或以上。
在一个包含 4960 名哮喘生物制剂使用者的队列中,有 1249 人在使用 6 至 12 个月后观察到停止使用。我们确定了一个匹配的队列,其中 1247 名停药者和 1247 名至少继续使用生物制剂 18 个月的患者。在停止或假停药后的前 6 个月,10.2%的停药者和 9.5%的继续使用者的哮喘加重率增加 50%或以上。我们发现停药者和继续使用者之间失败的调整后比值比相似(比值比=1.085;95%置信区间,0.833-1.413)。
停止使用哮喘生物制剂的患者中,哮喘加重的情况并不常见,且与继续使用哮喘生物制剂的匹配对照组相似。