Suppr超能文献

哮喘奥马珠单抗利用趋势:患者选择不当的证据。

Trends in Omalizumab Utilization for Asthma: Evidence of Suboptimal Patient Selection.

机构信息

Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1568-1577.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.034. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Utilization trends of omalizumab, a first-in-its-class asthma biologic approved in 2003 for individuals not controlled by inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), may reveal lessons in patient selection.

OBJECTIVE

To describe utilization patterns for omalizumab since its introduction in 2003, with a focus on patient-level characteristics of patients for whom omalizumab was initiated.

METHODS

Using a large US database of administrative claims, we identified privately insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with asthma between 2003 and 2015. Characteristics of incident (no omalizumab use in the previous 12 months) and prevalent users of omalizumab for asthma were described and omalizumab use trends graphed. A comparison cohort (1:5 matching proportion) of nonomalizumab users was compared with incident omalizumab users on demographic characteristics, medication adherence (medication possession ratio [MPR]) for ICSs and/or ICS/long-acting β-agonist (ICS-LABA), exacerbation frequency, and asthma control in the 6 months before omalizumab initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 7,658 prevalent and 3,399 incident omalizumab users. Omalizumab incidence peaked in the second quarter of 2004 at 0.65 per 1,000 individuals with asthma, whereas prevalence peaked in the fourth quarter of 2006 at 3.22; as of fourth quarter 2015, rates were 0.14 and 1.96, respectively. In the 12 months before omalizumab initiation, 72.5% had low adherence (MPR ≤ 0.75) and 48.6% had very low adherence (MPR ≤ 0.5) to ICSs and/or ICS-LABA. In the period 2003 to 2015, the mean number of exacerbations in the 12 months before incident use ranged from 1.50 to 2.11 and the proportion that had poor asthma control (≥3 rescue inhalers dispensed) ranged from 54% to 67%. Incident omalizumab users were less likely to have good asthma control than the matched cohort of nonusers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.53 [0.48-0.59]).

CONCLUSIONS

Omalizumab use for asthma has been gradually decreasing following a peak shortly after its market availability. Many omalizumab users have low or very low adherence rates for ICSs and/or ICS-LABA in the 12 months before omalizumab initiation.

摘要

背景

奥马珠单抗是首个获批的哮喘生物制剂,于 2003 年上市,用于治疗吸入皮质激素(ICSs)控制不佳的患者。奥马珠单抗的使用趋势可能揭示了患者选择方面的经验教训。

目的

描述自 2003 年奥马珠单抗上市以来的使用模式,重点关注起始奥马珠单抗治疗的患者的患者特征。

方法

我们使用美国大型行政索赔数据库,确定了 2003 年至 2015 年期间有哮喘的私人保险和医疗保险优势受益人群。描述了新诊断(过去 12 个月未使用奥马珠单抗)和奥马珠单抗治疗哮喘的现患患者的特征,并绘制了奥马珠单抗使用趋势图。与新诊断的奥马珠单抗使用者相比,非奥马珠单抗使用者的比较队列(1:5 匹配比例)在人口统计学特征、ICSs 和/或 ICS/长效β-激动剂(ICS-LABA)的药物依从性(药物使用比例[MPR])、哮喘恶化频率和奥马珠单抗起始前 6 个月的哮喘控制方面进行了比较。

结果

我们确定了 7658 例现患奥马珠单抗使用者和 3399 例新诊断奥马珠单抗使用者。奥马珠单抗的发病率在 2004 年第二季度达到高峰,每 1000 名哮喘患者中有 0.65 人使用奥马珠单抗,而患病率在 2006 年第四季度达到高峰,为 3.22;截至 2015 年第四季度,发病率分别为 0.14 和 1.96。在奥马珠单抗起始前 12 个月,72.5%的患者对 ICSs 和/或 ICS-LABA 的依从性较低(MPR≤0.75),48.6%的患者依从性极低(MPR≤0.5)。在 2003 年至 2015 年期间,起始使用前 12 个月内的平均哮喘恶化次数范围为 1.50 至 2.11,有 54%至 67%的患者哮喘控制不佳(≥3 次急救吸入器处方)。与未使用奥马珠单抗的匹配队列相比,新诊断的奥马珠单抗使用者发生哮喘控制不佳的可能性较低(调整后的优势比,0.53[0.48-0.59])。

结论

奥马珠单抗治疗哮喘的使用在上市后不久达到高峰后逐渐减少。在奥马珠单抗起始前 12 个月,许多奥马珠单抗使用者对 ICSs 和/或 ICS-LABA 的依从率较低或极低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验