Barrow Mark, Xu Linlin
Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104820. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104820. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
This study aims to explore the way in which nurse academics understand and (re)construct their academic identity.
An exploratory qualitative approach was adopted.
Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 nurse academics who were employed in positions requiring both research and teaching in two New Zealand university nursing schools. Participants' demographic information and critical career incidents were also collected. Interview data were analysed thematically.
Nurse academics understand their academic identity as research-related, relational and dynamic. Although their academic identity can be in conflict with their clinical one, the former is (re)constructed as an extension of the latter. To navigate each university's multiple expectations of academics, nurse academics in this study strive to maintain their engagement with teaching, research and clinical practice, although in some cases, clinical practice is reconceptualised in relation to teaching and researching rather than direct contact with patients.
Academic identity development is fluid and interdependent on that of clinical identity in this young and vocationally-based discipline. There is an interrelated, dual process of identity (re)construction - while (re)constructing academic identity, nurse academics also reshape and redefine their clinical identity. The trajectory of their identity development challenges institutions to consider the needs of nurse academics (and others in similar disciplines) by recognising and supporting the maintenance of a form of clinical currency in order to strengthen the discipline within the academy.
本研究旨在探索护士学者理解和(重新)构建其学术身份的方式。
采用探索性定性研究方法。
对新西兰两所大学护理学院中担任需要研究和教学双重职责职位的15名护士学者进行了个人半结构式访谈。还收集了参与者的人口统计学信息和关键职业事件。对访谈数据进行了主题分析。
护士学者将其学术身份理解为与研究相关、具有关联性且动态变化的。尽管他们的学术身份可能与其临床身份存在冲突,但前者被(重新)构建为后者的延伸。为了应对每所大学对学者的多重期望,本研究中的护士学者努力保持对教学、研究和临床实践的参与,尽管在某些情况下,临床实践是相对于教学和研究进行重新概念化的,而非与患者直接接触。
在这个年轻且基于职业的学科中,学术身份的发展是流动的,且与临床身份的发展相互依存。存在一个相互关联的双重身份(重新)构建过程——在(重新)构建学术身份的同时,护士学者也重塑和重新定义他们的临床身份。他们身份发展的轨迹促使机构通过认识和支持维持一种临床时效性形式来考虑护士学者(以及其他类似学科的人员)的需求,以加强学院内的学科建设。