Kuhn Eva, Fiske Amelia, Henningsen Peter, Buyx Alena
Sektion Global Health, Institut für Hygiene und Öffentliche Gesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Bonn.
Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Technische Universität München.
Psychiatr Prax. 2021 Mar;48(S 01):S26-S30. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-2938. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
This paper provides an overview of a range of ethical aspects involved in the use of autonomous, virtual or embodied artificial intelligence (AI) in the care of people with mental health issues.
The overview is based on a thematic literature review. It is guided by the principles of biomedical ethics together with the concept of epistemic (in)justice.
In addition to a risk-benefit analysis, (digital) health literacy, equity of access, issues of under- or misuse of care, and an adaptation of informed consent need to be considered.
The ethical assessment of autonomous AI in psychotherapy remains open; too many clinical, ethical, legal, and practical questions remain to be addressed. Quality criteria for AI application as well as guidelines for its clinical use need to be developed before wider clinical implementation.
本文概述了在为有心理健康问题的人提供护理时使用自主、虚拟或具身人工智能(AI)所涉及的一系列伦理问题。
本概述基于主题文献综述。它以生物医学伦理原则以及认知(不)公正概念为指导。
除了风险效益分析外,还需要考虑(数字)健康素养、获取的公平性、护理不足或滥用问题以及对知情同意的调整。
对心理治疗中自主人工智能的伦理评估仍未明确;仍有太多临床、伦理、法律和实际问题有待解决。在更广泛的临床应用之前,需要制定人工智能应用的质量标准及其临床使用指南。