Friedrich Orsolya, Seifert Johanna, Schleidgen Sebastian
Institut für Philosophie, Juniorprofessur für Medizinethik, FernUniversität Hagen.
Psychiatr Prax. 2021 Mar;48(S 01):S42-S47. doi: 10.1055/a-1364-5068. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
AI-based applications are increasingly developed to support users to digitally record, manage and change their emotions, beliefs and behavior patterns. Such forms of self-tracking in the mental sphere are accompanied by a variety of medical benefits in diagnostics, prevention, and therapy. This article pursues the question of which philosophical-ethical implications must be taken into account when dealing with these advantages.
First, some AI-based applications for self-tracking of mental characteristics and processes are outlined. Subsequently, relevant philosophical-ethical implications are presented.
The following aspects prove to be normatively relevant: improvement versus reduction of self-determination; improvement of self-knowledge versus alienation; positive versus negative aspects of self-responsible health care; epistemic challenges of AI applications; difficulties of conceptual and normative definitions in the applications.
基于人工智能的应用程序越来越多地被开发出来，以支持用户对自己的情绪、信念和行为模式进行数字化记录、管理和改变。这种在心理领域的自我追踪形式在诊断、预防和治疗方面伴随着各种医学益处。本文探讨了在利用这些优势时必须考虑哪些哲学伦理含义。
首先，概述一些用于自我追踪心理特征和过程的基于人工智能的应用程序。随后，阐述相关的哲学伦理含义。
以下几个方面在规范上具有相关性：自主决定权的增强与削弱；自我认知的提升与异化；自我负责的医疗保健的积极与消极方面；人工智能应用的认知挑战；应用中概念和规范定义的困难。
