• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协同改善重度抑郁症认知行为疗法的过程。

The Synergistic Process of Improvement in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depression.

机构信息

Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052292.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18052292
PMID:33652563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7956317/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a substantial lack of qualitative research concerning individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). In the present study, we wanted to explore how patients suffering from MDD experience improvement in CBT.

METHOD

Patients with MDD ( = 10) were interviewed at therapy termination with semi-structured qualitative interviews. The transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

We identified three elements that were relevant to the process of improvement for all patients: the therapeutic relationship, the therapeutic interventions and increased insight. There is a dynamic interrelationship and synergy between these elements that may explain why patients considered the same elements as helpful, but often in different ways and at different stages of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Highlighting the synergies and interrelationship between the elements that patients experience as helpful, may help therapists to learn from and utilize these experiences. This is a reminder of the importance of always being attentive to the individual processes of patients.

摘要

背景

针对重度抑郁症患者的个体认知行为疗法(CBT)的定性研究非常匮乏。本研究旨在探索患有 MDD 的患者如何在 CBT 中体验到改善。

方法

在治疗结束时,我们对 10 名 MDD 患者进行了半结构化的定性访谈。使用主题分析方法对转录本进行分析。

结果

我们确定了与所有患者的改善过程相关的三个要素:治疗关系、治疗干预和洞察力的提高。这些要素之间存在着动态的相互关系和协同作用,这也许可以解释为什么患者认为相同的要素有帮助,但往往在不同的方式和治疗的不同阶段。

结论

强调患者认为有帮助的要素之间的协同作用和相互关系,可以帮助治疗师从中学习并加以利用。这提醒我们,始终关注患者的个体进程非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26fc/7956317/15d9a94211f3/ijerph-18-02292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26fc/7956317/15d9a94211f3/ijerph-18-02292-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26fc/7956317/15d9a94211f3/ijerph-18-02292-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Synergistic Process of Improvement in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depression.协同改善重度抑郁症认知行为疗法的过程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052292.
2
Digging down or scratching the surface: how patients use metaphors to describe their experiences of psychotherapy.深挖或浅尝辄止:患者如何用隐喻来描述他们的心理治疗体验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03551-1.
3
How therapists in cognitive behavioral and psychodynamic therapy reflect upon the use of metaphors in therapy: a qualitative study.认知行为疗法和心理动力学治疗中的治疗师如何反思治疗中隐喻的使用:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04083-y.
4
The experience of cognitive behavioural therapy in depressed adolescents who are fatigued.疲劳的抑郁青少年接受认知行为疗法的体验。
Psychol Psychother. 2022 Mar;95(1):234-255. doi: 10.1111/papt.12365. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
5
The experience of young people receiving cognitive behavioural therapy for major depression: A qualitative study.年轻人接受认知行为疗法治疗重度抑郁症的体验:一项定性研究。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;17(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/eip.13290. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
The therapeutic relationship in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy with depressed adolescents: A qualitative study of good-outcome cases.认知行为疗法中与抑郁青少年的治疗关系:对预后良好病例的定性研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jun;93(2):276-291. doi: 10.1111/papt.12232. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Nonsomatic treatment of depression.抑郁症的非躯体治疗。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Jul;11(3):579-93. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00009-3.
8
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Is Associated With Enhanced Cognitive Control Network Activity in Major Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.认知行为疗法与重度抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍的认知控制网络活动增强有关。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Apr;3(4):311-319. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
How is a specialist depression service effective for persistent moderate to severe depressive disorder?: a qualitative study of service user experience.专科抑郁服务对持续性中重度抑郁障碍的有效性如何?:一项服务使用者体验的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1708-9.
10
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.互联网提供的针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的认知行为疗法:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1-199. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
"It takes time to see the whole picture": patients' views on improvement in cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy after three years.“了解全貌需要时间”:患者对认知行为疗法和心理动力疗法三年后的改善情况的看法
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 15;15:1342950. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1342950. eCollection 2024.
2
User Experiences of CBT for Anxiety and Depression: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.用户对焦虑和抑郁的认知行为疗法的体验:定性系统评价和荟萃综合。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 May;60(4):662-671. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01196-w. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Words for the hearts: a corpus study of metaphors in online depression communities.

本文引用的文献

1
Client-Identified Impacts of Helpful and Hindering Events in Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Meta-analysis.患者认定的心理治疗中有益和妨碍事件的影响:定性元分析。
Psychother Res. 2022 Jul;32(6):723-735. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.2003885. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
Mechanisms of change and heterogeneous treatment effects in psychodynamic and cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial.动力性心理治疗和认知行为治疗对抑郁症患者的疗效机制及异质性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00517-6.
3
Indirect effect of patient outcome expectation on improvement through alliance quality: A meta-analysis.
心灵之语:在线抑郁症社区隐喻的语料库研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1227123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1227123. eCollection 2023.
4
Digging down or scratching the surface: how patients use metaphors to describe their experiences of psychotherapy.深挖或浅尝辄止:患者如何用隐喻来描述他们的心理治疗体验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03551-1.
患者结果预期对通过联盟质量改善的间接影响:一项荟萃分析。
Psychother Res. 2021 Jul;31(6):711-725. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1851058. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
4
Improvement in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Depression: A Qualitative Study of the Patients' Perspective.改善抑郁的精神分析心理治疗:患者视角的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 19;17(18):6843. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186843.
5
Patient experiences of psychological therapy for depression: a qualitative metasynthesis.抑郁症心理治疗的患者体验:定性元分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02682-1.
6
Change processes underlying "good outcome": A qualitative study on recovered and improved patients' experiences in psychotherapy for major depression.“良好结局”背后的变化过程:对接受重度抑郁症心理治疗后康复和改善患者的经验的定性研究。
Psychother Res. 2020 Sep;30(7):948-964. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1722329. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
What "good outcome" means to patients: Understanding recovery and improvement in psychotherapy for major depression from a mixed-methods perspective.从混合方法的角度理解重度抑郁症心理治疗中的“良好结局”对患者的意义。
J Couns Psychol. 2020 Jan;67(1):25-39. doi: 10.1037/cou0000362. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
8
The Role of Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcomes.共同因素在心理治疗结果中的作用。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:207-231. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095424. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Individuals' Long Term Use of Cognitive Behavioural Skills to Manage their Depression: A Qualitative Study.个体长期使用认知行为技巧来管理其抑郁症状:一项定性研究。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2017 Jan;45(1):46-57. doi: 10.1017/S1352465816000382. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
A qualitative meta-analysis examining clients' experiences of psychotherapy: A new agenda.一项关于来访者接受心理治疗体验的定性元分析:一个新的议程。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Aug;142(8):801-830. doi: 10.1037/bul0000057. Epub 2016 Apr 28.