Mancuso Mauro, Tondo Serena Di, Costantini Enza, Damora Alessio, Sale Patrizio, Abbruzzese Laura
Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine Unit, NHS-USL Tuscany South-Est, Via Senese 169, 58100 Grosseto (GR), Italy.
Tuscany Rehabilitation Clinic, Montevarchi, Piazza del Volontariato 2, Montevarchi, 52025 Arezzo (AR), Italy.
Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 26;11(3):290. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11030290.
Due to the complexity of the interventions for upper limb recovery, at the moment there is a lack of evidence regarding innovative and effective rehabilitative interventions. Action Observation Training (AOT) constitutes a promising rehabilitative method to improve upper limb motor recovery in stroke patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of AOT, both in upper limb recovery and in functional outcomes when compared to patients treated with task oriented training (TOT). Both treatments were added to traditional rehabilitative treatment. Thirty-two acute stroke patients at 15.6 days (±8.3) from onset, with moderate to severe upper limb impairment at baseline following their first-ever stroke, were enrolled and randomized into two groups: 16 in the experimental group (EG) and 16 in the control group (CG). The EG underwent 30 min sessions of AOT, and the CG underwent 30 min sessions of TOT. All participants received 20 sessions of treatment for four consecutive weeks (five days/week). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Box and Block Test (BBT), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were administered at baseline (T) and at the end of treatment (T). No statistical differences were found at T for inclusion criteria between the CG and EG, whereas both groups improved significantly at T. After the treatment period, the rehabilitative gain was greater in the EG compared to the CG for FMA-UE and FIM (all < 0.05). Our results suggest that AOT can contribute to increased motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with moderate to severe upper limb impairment in the early phase after stroke. The improvements presented in this article, together with the lack of adverse events, confirm that the use of AOT should be broadened out to larger pools of subacute stroke patients.
由于上肢康复干预措施的复杂性,目前缺乏关于创新且有效的康复干预措施的证据。动作观察训练(AOT)是一种有望改善中风患者上肢运动恢复的康复方法。本研究的目的是评估与接受任务导向训练(TOT)的患者相比,AOT在上肢恢复和功能结局方面的潜在疗效。两种治疗方法均添加到传统康复治疗中。纳入了32例首次中风后15.6天(±8.3)、基线时上肢中度至重度受损的急性中风患者,并随机分为两组:实验组(EG)16例和对照组(CG)16例。EG组接受30分钟的AOT训练,CG组接受30分钟的TOT训练。所有参与者连续四周(每周五天)接受20次治疗。在基线期(T0)和治疗结束时(T)进行上肢Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA-UE)、箱块测试(BBT)、功能独立性测量(FIM)和改良Ashworth量表(MAS)评估。CG组和EG组在T0时纳入标准无统计学差异,而两组在T时均有显著改善。治疗期结束后,EG组在FMA-UE和FIM方面的康复增益大于CG组(均P<0.05)。我们的结果表明,AOT有助于中风后早期中度至重度上肢受损的亚急性中风患者提高运动恢复。本文呈现的改善效果以及缺乏不良事件,证实应将AOT的应用扩大到更多的亚急性中风患者群体。