Wong Alicia Y W, Johnsson Alexander T A, Iversen Aina, Athlin Simon, Özenci Volkan
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Microorganisms. 2021 Feb 26;9(3):493. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9030493.
Urinary antigen tests (UATs) are often used to diagnose Legionnaires' disease as they are rapid and easy to perform on readily obtainable urine samples without the need for specialized skills compared to conventional methods. Recently developed automated readers for UATs may provide objective results interpretation, especially in cases of weak result bands. Using 53 defined patient urine samples, we evaluated the performance of the BinaxNOW Antigen Card (Abbott), ImmuView and (SSI Diagnostica), STANDARD F Ag FIA (SD Biosensor), and Sofia FIA (Quidel) simultaneously with their respective automated readers. Automatic and visual interpretation of result bands were also compared for the immunochromatography-based BinaxNOW and ImmuView UATs. Overall sensitivity and specificity of UATs were 53.9-61.5% and 90.0-94.9%, respectively. All four UATs successfully detected all samples from serogroup 1-positive patients, but most failed to detect samples for spp., or other serogroups. Automatic results interpretation of results was found to be mostly concordant with visual results reading. In conclusion, the performance of the four UATs were similar to each other in the detection of urinary antigen with no major difference between automated or visual results reading.
尿抗原检测(UATs)常用于诊断军团病,因为与传统方法相比,它们快速且易于在容易获得的尿液样本上进行,无需专业技能。最近开发的UATs自动读数仪可以提供客观的结果解读,特别是在结果条带较弱的情况下。我们使用53份定义明确的患者尿液样本,同时使用各自的自动读数仪评估了BinaxNOW抗原卡(雅培公司)、ImmuView(SSI诊断公司)、STANDARD F Ag FIA(SD生物传感器公司)和Sofia FIA(Quidel公司)的性能。还对基于免疫层析的BinaxNOW和ImmuView UATs的结果条带进行了自动和目视解读比较。UATs的总体敏感性和特异性分别为53.9 - 61.5%和90.0 - 94.9%。所有四种UATs都成功检测出了血清群1阳性患者的所有样本,但大多数未能检测出嗜肺军团菌属其他种或其他血清群的样本。发现结果的自动解读大多与目视解读一致。总之,这四种UATs在检测尿抗原方面性能相似,自动或目视结果解读之间没有重大差异。