Suppr超能文献

当前军团病诊断方法在把握临床相关流行病学方面的充分性:一项范围综述

The Adequacy of Current Legionnaires' Disease Diagnostic Practices in Capturing the Epidemiology of Clinically Relevant : A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Ha Ryan, Heilmann Ashley, Lother Sylvain A, Turenne Christine, Alexander David, Keynan Yoav, Rueda Zulma Vanessa

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, 745 Bannatyne Ave., Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, 750 Bannatyne Ave., Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada.

出版信息

Pathogens. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):857. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13100857.

Abstract

is an underdiagnosed and underreported etiology of pneumonia. serogroup 1 (LpSG1) is thought to be the most common pathogenic subgroup. This assumption is based on the frequent use of a urinary antigen test (UAT), only capable of diagnosing LpSG1. We aimed to explore the frequency of infections in individuals diagnosed with pneumonia and the performance of diagnostic methods for detecting infections. We conducted a scoping review to answer the following questions: (1) "Does nucleic acid testing (NAT) increase the detection of non- serogroup 1 compared to non-NAT?"; and (2) "Does being immunocompromised increase the frequency of pneumonia caused by non- serogroup 1 compared to non-immunocompromised individuals with Legionnaires' disease (LD)?". Articles reporting various diagnostic methods (both NAT and non-NAT) for pneumonia were extracted from several databases. Of the 3449 articles obtained, 31 were included in our review. The most common species were found to be , , and unidentified species appearing in 1.4%, 0.9%, and 0.6% of pneumonia cases. Nearly 50% of cases were caused by unspecified species or serogroups not detected by the standard UAT. NAT-based techniques were more likely to detect than non-NAT-based techniques. The identification and detection of and serogroups other than serogroup 1 is hampered by a lack of application of broader pan- or pan-serogroup diagnostics.

摘要

是一种诊断不足且报告不足的肺炎病因。血清群1(嗜肺军团菌血清群1,LpSG1)被认为是最常见的致病亚群。这一假设基于尿抗原检测(UAT)的频繁使用,该检测仅能诊断LpSG1。我们旨在探讨肺炎确诊患者中嗜肺军团菌感染的频率以及检测嗜肺军团菌感染的诊断方法的性能。我们进行了一项范围综述以回答以下问题:(1)“与非核酸检测(NAT)相比,核酸检测(NAT)是否能增加非血清群1嗜肺军团菌的检测率?”;以及(2)“与非免疫受损的军团病(LD)患者相比,免疫受损是否会增加非血清群1嗜肺军团菌引起的肺炎频率?”。从多个数据库中提取了报告肺炎各种诊断方法(包括NAT和非NAT)的文章。在获得的3449篇文章中,31篇被纳入我们的综述。发现最常见的菌种是嗜肺军团菌、博兹曼军团菌以及未鉴定的菌种,分别出现在1.4%、0.9%和0.6%的肺炎病例中。近50%的病例由标准UAT未检测到的未指定菌种或血清群引起。基于NAT的技术比基于非NAT的技术更有可能检测到嗜肺军团菌。由于缺乏更广泛的泛嗜肺军团菌或泛血清群诊断方法的应用,嗜肺军团菌及血清群1以外的血清群的鉴定和检测受到阻碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2475/11510479/aae26649c1de/pathogens-13-00857-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验