Division of Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Department of Orthodontics, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Jan;59(1):54-65. doi: 10.1177/1055665621995313. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
This study aimed to develop a new method to quantify occlusal improvement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone orthodontic treatment and to evaluate its reproducibility.
A panel of orthodontists decided on the relevance of different occlusal features to score initial and final 3-dimensional study models and panoramic radiographs. A subsequent subjective analysis was later performed by a local orthodontic panel.
The sample was obtained from the orthodontic clinical archives of a hospital known for the treatment of patients with craniofacial differences.
Thirty-one nonsyndromic patients, 17 males and 14 females, were randomly selected according to preestablished inclusion/exclusion criteria.
The records corresponded to the period during which the patients were treated with conventional multibracket mechanics and adjunctive restorative procedures.
MAIN OUTCOME/MEASURES: The intraclass correlation coefficient measured intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements. The Spearman correlation test assessed the relationship between the local orthodontic panel perception and the improvement scores.
Inter- and intra-rater ICCs varied between fair/good to excellent. There was a strong correlation between the Cleft-Customized Occlusal Rating system classification of occlusal improvement and the local orthodontic panel's perception, thereby enabling the utilization of the interpretation scale by the panel.
The method showed to be a useful tool in quantifying and classifying occlusal improvement in this specific population. As any other method, some limitations apply and need to be accounted for.
本研究旨在为单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)患者正畸治疗后的咬合改善情况建立一种新的量化方法,并评估其可重复性。
一组正畸医生根据不同的咬合特征对初始和最终的三维研究模型和全景片进行评分。随后,由当地的正畸小组进行主观分析。
该样本取自一家以治疗颅面畸形患者而闻名的医院的正畸临床档案。
根据预先确定的纳入/排除标准,随机选择了 31 名非综合征患者,其中男性 17 名,女性 14 名。
记录包括患者接受传统多托槽力学和辅助修复治疗的时期。
主要结果/措施:组内相关系数(ICC)用于测量评估者之间和评估者内部的一致性。Spearman 相关检验评估了局部正畸小组感知与改善评分之间的关系。
组内和组间 ICC 介于良好到优秀之间。Cleft-Customized Occlusal Rating 系统对咬合改善的分类与局部正畸小组的感知之间存在很强的相关性,从而使小组能够使用解释量表。
该方法在量化和分类特定人群的咬合改善方面是一种有用的工具。与任何其他方法一样,它也存在一些局限性,需要加以考虑。