Department of Research & Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy.
Experimental Imaging Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2021 Jul;16(7):727-735. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1887132. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
: As the global burden of Alzheimer's disease (AD) grows, an effective disease-modifying therapy remains a distant prospect following the repeated failure of multiple therapeutics targeting β-amyloid and (it seems) tau over many years of costly effort. The repeated failure of single-target therapies to meaningfully modify disease progression raises major questions about the validity of many aspects of drug development in this area, especially target selection.: The authors explore the critical questions raised by a review of the collective experience to date, relating to why findings with non-clinical models and clinical biomarkers so frequently fail to translate to positive outcomes in clinical trials, which alternatives should be considered, and how we can design and conduct clinical trials that can successfully identify and quantify meaningful benefits in the future.: It is our opinion that we must recognize and accept the need to consider less specific, more multimodal approaches to addressing neurodegeneration in AD if we are to make progress - and we must avoid repeating the well intentioned, but ultimately erroneous, assumptions of the past.
随着全球阿尔茨海默病(AD)负担的增加,在多年来针对β-淀粉样蛋白和(似乎)tau 的多种治疗方法反复失败后,一种有效的疾病修饰疗法仍然遥遥无期。单一靶点疗法多次未能显著改变疾病进展,这对该领域药物开发的许多方面的有效性提出了重大质疑,尤其是靶点选择。
作者探讨了迄今为止对现有研究结果进行综述所提出的关键问题,涉及为什么非临床模型和临床生物标志物的发现如此频繁地未能转化为临床试验中的积极结果,应该考虑哪些替代方案,以及我们如何设计和进行临床试验,以便将来能够成功地确定和量化有意义的益处。
我们认为,如果我们要取得进展,就必须认识到并接受需要考虑针对 AD 中神经退行性变的不那么具体、更具多模式的方法——我们必须避免重复过去那些善意但最终错误的假设。