Centre for Cognition and Perception, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, Illinois.
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 7;41(14):3180-3191. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Past work has demonstrated that active suppression of salient distractors is a critical part of visual selection. Evidence for goal-driven suppression includes below-baseline visual encoding at the position of salient distractors (Gaspelin and Luck, 2018) and neural signals such as the distractor positivity (Pd) that track how many distractors are presented in a given hemifield (Feldmann-Wüstefeld and Vogel, 2019). One basic question regarding distractor suppression is whether it is inherently spatial or nonspatial in character. Indeed, past work has shown that distractors evoke both spatial (Theeuwes, 1992) and nonspatial forms of interference (Folk and Remington, 1998), motivating a direct examination of whether space is integral to goal-driven distractor suppression. Here, we use behavioral and EEG data from adult humans (male and female) to provide clear evidence for a spatial gradient of suppression surrounding salient singleton distractors. Replicating past work, both reaction time and neural indices of target selection improved monotonically as the distance between target and distractor increased. Importantly, these target selection effects were paralleled by a monotonic decline in the amplitude of the Pd, an electrophysiological index of distractor suppression. Moreover, multivariate analyses revealed spatially selective activity in the θ-band that tracked the position of the target and, critically, revealed suppressed activity at spatial channels centered on distractor positions. Thus, goal-driven selection of relevant over irrelevant information benefits from a spatial gradient of suppression surrounding salient distractors. Past work has shown that distractor suppression is an important part of goal-driven attentional selection, but has not yet revealed whether suppression is spatially directed. Using behavioral data, event-related potentials (ERPs) of the EEG signal [N2pc and distractor positivity (Pd) component], as well as a multivariate model of EEG data [channel tuning functions (CTF)], we show that suppression-related neural activity increases monotonically as the distance between targets and distractors decreases, and that spatially-selective activity in the θ-band reveals depressed activity in spatial channels that index distractor positions. Thus, we provide robust evidence for spatially-guided distractor suppression, a result that has important implications for models of goal-driven attentional control.
过去的工作已经证明,主动抑制显著的干扰物是视觉选择的关键部分。目标驱动抑制的证据包括在显著干扰物位置的低于基线的视觉编码(Gaspelin 和 Luck,2018)和神经信号,如跟踪在给定半视野中呈现多少个干扰物的干扰正波(Pd)(Feldmann-Wüstefeld 和 Vogel,2019)。关于干扰物抑制的一个基本问题是,它在性质上是空间的还是非空间的。事实上,过去的工作已经表明,干扰物既会引起空间形式的干扰(Theeuwes,1992),也会引起非空间形式的干扰(Folk 和 Remington,1998),这促使人们直接研究空间是否是目标驱动的干扰物抑制的组成部分。在这里,我们使用来自成年人(男性和女性)的行为和脑电图数据,提供了清晰的证据,证明显著的单一干扰物周围存在空间梯度的抑制。复制过去的工作,随着目标和干扰物之间的距离增加,反应时间和目标选择的神经指数都单调地提高。重要的是,这些目标选择效应与 Pd 的振幅单调下降相平行,Pd 是干扰物抑制的电生理指标。此外,多元分析显示,θ 波段的活动具有空间选择性,跟踪目标的位置,并且关键的是,在以干扰物位置为中心的空间通道中显示出抑制性活动。因此,目标驱动的对相关信息的选择受益于显著干扰物周围的空间梯度抑制。过去的工作已经表明,干扰物抑制是目标驱动注意力选择的一个重要部分,但尚未揭示抑制是否是空间定向的。使用行为数据、脑电图信号的事件相关电位(ERP)[N2pc 和干扰正波(Pd)成分]以及脑电图数据的多元模型[通道调谐函数(CTF)],我们表明,随着目标和干扰物之间的距离减小,与抑制相关的神经活动单调增加,θ 波段中的空间选择性活动揭示了指示干扰物位置的空间通道中抑制性活动的减少。因此,我们为空间引导的干扰物抑制提供了强有力的证据,这一结果对目标驱动的注意力控制模型具有重要意义。