Schoeberl Tobias, Ditye Thomas, Ansorge Ulrich
Department of Psychology, University of Vienna.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Mar;44(3):433-451. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000470. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
Prior studies using the peripheral cueing paradigm have shown that singleton cues that do not match to the top-down search settings of the observer can impair performance in visual search when the cue appears at the target location (in valid conditions) compared with when the cue appears at a location away from the target (in invalid conditions). This pattern, the same-location cost (SLC), has recently been suggested to originate from an awareness-dependent updating of object files in working memory. It has also been argued that the processes underlying the SLC could have obscured results of prior studies by masking attentional capture effects by peripheral cues under certain conditions. Here, we investigated to which extent the object-file updating hypothesis can be generalized and delineate necessary side conditions for object-file updating to produce the SLC. In Experiments 1 to 3, we show that during search for spatial frequencies, SLCs emerged that are at odds with the object-file updating hypothesis. SLCs were not dependent on cue awareness and were, unlike SLCs with color cues and targets (Experiment 4), not entirely eliminated where feature updating was necessary in valid and invalid conditions. We conclude that some instances of the SLC can be explained by object-file updating, but, as the present study shows, other instances of the SLC are at odds with this explanation and are therefore more likely of an attentional origin. We end with a discussion of which side conditions might favor the emergence of SLCs as a result of object-file updating. (PsycINFO Database Record
先前使用外周线索范式的研究表明,当线索出现在目标位置(有效条件下)时,与线索出现在远离目标的位置(无效条件下)相比,与观察者自上而下搜索设置不匹配的单独线索会损害视觉搜索表现。这种模式,即同位置代价(SLC),最近有人提出它源于工作记忆中客体文件的意识依赖更新。也有人认为,SLC背后的过程可能在某些条件下通过掩盖外周线索的注意捕获效应而掩盖了先前研究的结果。在这里,我们研究了客体文件更新假说在多大程度上可以推广,并确定了客体文件更新产生SLC所需的附带条件。在实验1至3中,我们表明,在搜索空间频率期间,出现了与客体文件更新假说不一致的SLC。SLC不依赖于线索意识,并且与颜色线索和目标的SLC不同(实验4),在有效和无效条件下需要特征更新的情况下,SLC并没有完全消除。我们得出结论,SLC的某些情况可以用客体文件更新来解释,但正如本研究所示,SLC的其他情况与这种解释不一致,因此更可能源于注意。最后,我们讨论了哪些附带条件可能有利于由于客体文件更新而出现SLC。(PsycINFO数据库记录)