Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 May;30(5):920-926. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1686. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Lifestyle factors related to energy balance have been associated with ovarian cancer risk and influence the tumor immune microenvironment, including tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). However, no studies have assessed whether these factors differentially impact ovarian cancer risk by TAM densities.
We conducted a prospective analysis in the Nurses' Health Studies to examine the associations of physical activity, sitting time, and a food-based empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) score with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer risk by TAM density assessed by immunohistochemistry. We considered density of CD68 (marker of total TAMs) and CD163 (marker of pro-carcinogenic M2-type TAMs), and their ratios. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of exposures with risk of ovarian tumors with high versus low TAMs, including analyses stratified by body mass index.
Analyses included 312 incident ovarian cancer cases with TAM measurements. Physical activity, sitting time, and EDIP score were not differentially associated with ovarian cancer risk by TAM densities ( > 0.05). Among overweight and obese women, higher EDIP score was associated with increased risk of CD163 low-density tumors (HR comparing extreme tertiles, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.88-2.80; = 0.01), but not CD163 high-density tumors (comparable HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.73-1.86; = 0.24), though this difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.22).
We did not observe differential associations between lifestyle factors and ovarian cancer risk by TAM densities.
Future investigations examining the interplay between other ovarian cancer risk factors and the tumor immune microenvironment may help provide insight into ovarian cancer etiology.
与能量平衡相关的生活方式因素与卵巢癌风险相关,并影响肿瘤免疫微环境,包括肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAM)。然而,尚无研究评估这些因素是否通过 TAM 密度对卵巢癌风险产生差异影响。
我们在护士健康研究中进行了一项前瞻性分析,通过免疫组织化学评估 TAM 密度,研究体力活动、久坐时间和基于食物的经验性饮食炎症模式(EDIP)评分与侵袭性上皮性卵巢癌风险之间的关联。我们考虑了 CD68(总 TAM 的标志物)和 CD163(致癌性 M2 型 TAM 的标志物)的密度及其比值。我们使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归来计算暴露与高 TAM 与低 TAM 卵巢肿瘤风险的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),包括按体重指数分层的分析。
分析包括 312 例有 TAM 测量值的卵巢癌病例。体力活动、久坐时间和 EDIP 评分与 TAM 密度无差异相关( > 0.05)。在超重和肥胖女性中,较高的 EDIP 评分与 CD163 低密度肿瘤的风险增加相关(比较极端三分位的 HR,1.57;95%CI,0.88-2.80; = 0.01),但与 CD163 高密度肿瘤无关(可比 HR,1.16;95%CI,0.73-1.86; = 0.24),尽管这种差异没有统计学意义( = 0.22)。
我们没有观察到生活方式因素与 TAM 密度之间卵巢癌风险的差异关联。
未来研究检查其他卵巢癌危险因素与肿瘤免疫微环境之间的相互作用,可能有助于深入了解卵巢癌的病因。