Mossman D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425-0742.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1988;16(1):49-58.
In United States v. Lyons (1984), the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court altered its definition of legal insanity to conform with recent recommendations of the American Bar Association and the American Psychiatric Association. This paper briefly reviews the social and legal context of the Court's ruling. The author then discusses the insanity defense's rationale and suggests an interpretation of the Court's new definition that should guide psychiatric testimony.
在美国诉莱昂斯案(1984年)中,美国第五巡回上诉法院改变了其对法定精神错乱的定义,以符合美国律师协会和美国精神病学协会最近的建议。本文简要回顾了法院裁决的社会和法律背景。作者随后讨论了精神错乱抗辩的基本原理,并对法院的新定义提出了一种解释,该解释应指导精神病学证词。