Allen Justin, Conard Jennifer, Wang Michael
Lakeland Health Internal Medicine Resident, PGY 3, Saint Joseph, M.
Lakeland Health Internal Medicine Resident, PGY 3, Saint Joseph, MI.
Spartan Med Res J. 2017 Aug 24;2(1):5967. doi: 10.51894/001c.5967.
The neuroinvasive form of West Nile disease is an uncommon manifestation of the viral infection. To date, documented cases in Michigan of neuroinvasive decompensation from this virus have been rare. Evaluation requires a broad differential diagnosis and treatment options are still quite limited. Objective evaluations entailing physical exam and radiographic and laboratory changes are nonspecific. Serologic testing of cerebrospinal fluid by enzyme immunoassay remains the gold standard for diagnosis. However, IgM antibodies typically do not develop until after the fourth to seventh day of symptom onset. This retrospective case report presents an immunocompromised male patient in his mid-70s in whom neuroinvasive West Nile virus was diagnosed postmortem. All information was obtained from the patient's electronic health record. This patient's immunocompromised state at the time of West Nile exposure made him more susceptible to neuroinvasive disease progression and ultimately influenced the outcome. Prior to withdrawing care, the patient was treated for methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) cellulitis and Type 1 Herpes Simplex virus. In this case, neuroinvasive West Nile virus was a less likely diagnosis given the patient's physical exam findings and the context of more likely alternative explanations for his cognitive decline. Treatment options for neuroinvasive forms of West Nile virus are still supportive and would not have altered the patient's hospital course. This case report demonstrates that clinicians must maintain an ongoing index of suspicion for infection in warmer climates where West Nile is becoming more prevalent. Given some patients' obscure physical exam findings and radiographic imaging results, a thorough history with laboratory conformation is required for a more conclusive diagnosis.
西尼罗河病的神经侵袭型是这种病毒感染的一种罕见表现。迄今为止,密歇根州有记录的因该病毒导致神经侵袭性失代偿的病例很少。评估需要进行广泛的鉴别诊断,而治疗选择仍然非常有限。包括体格检查、影像学和实验室检查变化在内的客观评估都不具有特异性。通过酶免疫测定法对脑脊液进行血清学检测仍然是诊断的金标准。然而,IgM抗体通常要到症状出现后的第四至第七天才会产生。这份回顾性病例报告介绍了一名70多岁的免疫功能低下男性患者,其死后被诊断为神经侵袭性西尼罗河病毒感染。所有信息均从患者的电子健康记录中获取。该患者在接触西尼罗河病毒时的免疫功能低下状态使他更容易发生神经侵袭性疾病进展,并最终影响了结局。在停止治疗之前,该患者接受了对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)蜂窝织炎和1型单纯疱疹病毒的治疗。在这种情况下,鉴于患者的体格检查结果以及对其认知衰退更有可能的其他解释,神经侵袭性西尼罗河病毒感染的诊断可能性较小。西尼罗河病毒神经侵袭型的治疗选择仍然是支持性的,并且不会改变患者的住院病程。这份病例报告表明,在西尼罗河病毒日益流行的温暖气候地区,临床医生必须始终对感染保持怀疑。鉴于一些患者的体格检查结果和影像学检查结果不明确,需要详细的病史并结合实验室检查结果才能做出更确凿的诊断。