• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过基于社区的毕业后医学教育协作组织开展美国医学院协会“优质教学”项目:迄今的经验教训

Delivering the AAMC "Teaching for Quality" Program through a Community-Based GME Collaborative: Lessons Learned to Date.

作者信息

Church Brandy, Corser William, Rohrer Jonathan, Hortos Kari, Harrison Angela

机构信息

Statewide Campus System, College of Osteopathic Medicine Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

出版信息

Spartan Med Res J. 2018 Sep 26;3(2):6977. doi: 10.51894/001c.6977.

DOI:10.51894/001c.6977
PMID:33655141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7746054/
Abstract

CONTEXT

To address scholarly activity (SA) accreditation standards, the Michigan State University's College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System has offered the Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC) Teaching for Quality Program for two cohorts of community-based faculty. The purpose of this paper was to describe the design and delivery of the customized program, the authors' initial lessons learned, and their plans for further evaluation and dissemination.

METHODS

The authors customized the program to overcome the barriers typically faced by community-based program faculty learners through a graduate medical education (GME) consortium model. This was the first time this program was delivered in this manner.

RESULTS

The authors' initial cohort of 19 learners successfully developed 15 projects, with two pairs of learners collaborating on projects. The second cohort of 15 learners developed 11 projects, with one pair of learners collaborating. The authors present a series of principles for community-based GME leaders striving to develop SA projects in their respective GME environments.

CONCLUSIONS

The "consortium advantage" derived from entities such as the SCS may prove integral to efficiently coordinating SA project resources and knowledge across diverse GME systems.

摘要

背景

为满足学术活动(SA)认证标准,密歇根州立大学整骨医学院全州校园系统为两批社区教师提供了美国医学院协会(AAMC)的质量教学计划。本文旨在描述定制计划的设计与实施、作者初步吸取的经验教训以及他们进一步评估和传播的计划。

方法

作者通过研究生医学教育(GME)联盟模式定制该计划,以克服社区计划教师学习者通常面临的障碍。这是该计划首次以这种方式实施。

结果

作者的第一批19名学习者成功开发了15个项目,其中两对学习者合作开展项目。第二批15名学习者开发了11个项目,有一对学习者合作。作者为致力于在各自GME环境中开展SA项目的社区GME领导者提出了一系列原则。

结论

从SCS等实体中获得的“联盟优势”可能被证明对于跨不同GME系统有效协调SA项目资源和知识至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15cf/7746054/998d980879a9/smrj_2018_3_2_6977_17765.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15cf/7746054/998d980879a9/smrj_2018_3_2_6977_17765.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15cf/7746054/998d980879a9/smrj_2018_3_2_6977_17765.jpg

相似文献

1
Delivering the AAMC "Teaching for Quality" Program through a Community-Based GME Collaborative: Lessons Learned to Date.通过基于社区的毕业后医学教育协作组织开展美国医学院协会“优质教学”项目:迄今的经验教训
Spartan Med Res J. 2018 Sep 26;3(2):6977. doi: 10.51894/001c.6977.
2
The Statewide Campus System Scholarly Activity Developmental Planning Framework for Community-Based GME Leaders.面向社区基础毕业后医学教育领导者的全州校园系统学术活动发展规划框架
Spartan Med Res J. 2018 Apr 27;3(1):6521. doi: 10.51894/001c.6521.
3
The Military Medicine Leadership Life Cycle: A Model for Longitudinal Leadership Development in Medicine-Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education.军事医学领导力生命周期:医学本科及研究生医学教育中纵向领导力发展的模型
Mil Med. 2025 Jan 16;190(1-2):19-23. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae366.
4
Defining GME Librarianship: Creating and Developing a New Graduate Medical Education Library Program and Librarian Position.定义 GME 图书馆员职业:创建和发展新的研究生医学教育图书馆项目和图书馆员职位。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2021 Oct-Dec;40(4):355-368. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2021.1987773.
5
Improving oversight of the graduate medical education enterprise: one institution's strategies and tools.加强毕业后医学教育事业的监督:一所机构的策略与工具
Acad Med. 2006 May;81(5):419-25. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000222258.55266.6a.
6
Jump-Starting Faculty Development in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Education: A Team-Based Approach.促进质量改进和患者安全教育领域的教师发展:一种基于团队的方法。
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11):1728-1732. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002784.
7
Creation of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors Faculty Development for Educators "Nuts and Bolts" Teaching Aids.创建儿科项目主任协会,为教育工作者提供教师发展“基本要素”教学辅助工具。
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Jan-Feb;22(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
8
Engaging GME Learners in Health System-Aligned Improvement Work in the Clinical Learning Environment.在临床学习环境中让住院医师规范化培训学员参与与医疗体系一致的改进工作。
Am J Med Qual. 2024;39(1):33-41. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000160. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
9
Building faculty community: fellowship in graduate medical education administration.构建教师社群:研究生医学教育管理中的伙伴关系
J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Sep;1(1):146-9. doi: 10.4300/01.01.0024.
10
A Statewide Strategy for Expanding Graduate Medical Education by Establishing New Teaching Hospitals and Residency Programs.通过建立新的教学医院和住院医师培训项目来扩大研究生医学教育的全州战略。
Acad Med. 2015 Sep;90(9):1264-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000803.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice Makes Better: Effective Faculty Educator Skill Development in the Virtual Space.熟能生巧:虚拟空间中教师有效教育技能的发展
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):303-308. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00212.1. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Common Problematic Scholarly Activity Project Planning Expectations of Project Novices.常见的学术活动问题 项目规划 对项目新手的期望
Spartan Med Res J. 2021 Apr 13;6(1):21274. doi: 10.51894/001c.21274.

本文引用的文献

1
The Statewide Campus System Scholarly Activity Developmental Planning Framework for Community-Based GME Leaders.面向社区基础毕业后医学教育领导者的全州校园系统学术活动发展规划框架
Spartan Med Res J. 2018 Apr 27;3(1):6521. doi: 10.51894/001c.6521.
2
X + Y = Time for QI: Meaningful Engagement of Residents in Quality Improvement During the Ambulatory Block.X + Y = 质量改进时间:门诊实习期间住院医师有意义地参与质量改进
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):316-324. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00761.1.
3
Piloting a patient safety and quality improvement co-curriculum.
试行患者安全与质量改进联合课程。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017 Dec 14;7(6):351-357. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2017.1403830. eCollection 2017.
4
Effectiveness of iterative interventions to increase research productivity in one residency program.迭代干预措施对提高一个住院医师培训项目研究生产力的有效性。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2015 Dec 11;5(6):29203. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v5.29203. eCollection 2015.
5
Looking at Graduate Medical Education Through a Different Lens: A Health Care System's Perspective.从不同视角审视毕业后医学教育:医疗保健系统的观点
Acad Med. 2015 Sep;90(9):1231-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000828.
6
A Scholarly Pathway in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety.学术之路:质量改进与患者安全
Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1358-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000772.
7
Putting communities in the driver's seat: the realities of community-engaged medical education.让社区发挥主导作用:社区参与式医学教育的现实情况。
Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11):1466-70. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000765.
8
Transforming primary care residency training: a collaborative faculty development initiative among family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatric residencies.转变基层医疗住院医师培训:家庭医学、内科和儿科住院医师培训之间的合作师资发展倡议。
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1054-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000701.
9
Building the pipeline: the creation of a residency training pathway for future physician leaders in health care quality.构建管道:为未来的医疗保健质量领域的医师领袖创建住院医师培训途径。
Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):185-90. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000546.
10
A structured step-by-step program to increase scholarly activity.一个用于增加学术活动的结构化循序渐进计划。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):e19-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Sep 18.