Bombard Matthew C, Koaches Hannah Cm, Francis Omar J
Emergency Medicine Physician Reston Hospital Center, Reston, VA.
PGY4 Emergency Medicine Resident, Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township, MI.
Spartan Med Res J. 2018 Sep 26;3(2):7004. doi: 10.51894/001c.7004.
Emergency Departments (ED) have faced increasing challenges in providing quality, cost-effective patient care. In addition, healthcare administrators have sought specific techniques to improve patient perceptions of care and satisfaction as a component of Medicare reimbursement and physician contract retention. This five-month study sought to examine whether contacting patients per phone or leaving them a voicemail message after an ED visit might influence their perceptions of care and subsequent follow-up care preferences.
A sample of 95 discharged ED patients were contacted by phone and mailed surveys rating their likelihood of return directly for future ED as well as scheduling office-based visits. Patients were stratified by whether they were: a) directly spoken to over the phone, b) left a voicemail message, or c) never successfully contacted. Mailed patient surveys utilized a five-point Likert-type scale items concerning future follow-up care preferences. Sample patients were also monitored in the electronic health record to correlate self-reported intentions with whether they actually returned to the same ED for the same chief complaint within 30 days of their initial visit.
Those patients who were directly contacted after ED discharge tended to be more likely to report they would return to the same ED, although not significantly (p = 0.060). Patients who were left a voicemail message were not more likely to return to the ED (p = 0.230). However, patients who were contacted directly indicated that they were more likely to adhere to received discharge instructions (p = 0.010). Neither did phoning patients significantly influence whether they followed-up with clinic providers (p = 0.999) or return to the same ED within 30 days (p = 0.999).
Although there are often many complex factors influencing patients' post-ED care decisions, the results from this smaller project indicated that contacting patients after ED discharge may help influence their perceptions of care and influence some follow-up care preferences.
急诊科在提供高质量、具成本效益的患者护理方面面临着越来越多的挑战。此外,医疗保健管理人员一直在寻求特定技术,以改善患者对护理的认知和满意度,这是医疗保险报销和医生合同续签的一个组成部分。这项为期五个月的研究旨在探讨在急诊科就诊后通过电话联系患者或给他们留语音邮件是否会影响他们对护理的认知以及后续的随访护理偏好。
通过电话联系了95名已出院的急诊科患者,并邮寄了调查问卷,让他们对未来直接返回急诊科以及安排门诊就诊的可能性进行评分。患者按以下方式分层:a)通过电话直接交谈,b)留语音邮件,或c)从未成功联系过。邮寄给患者的调查问卷使用了一个五点李克特量表项目,涉及未来的随访护理偏好。还在电子健康记录中对样本患者进行了监测,以将自我报告的意图与他们在初次就诊后30天内是否因相同的主要症状实际返回同一家急诊科相关联。
急诊科出院后直接联系的患者往往更有可能报告他们会返回同一家急诊科,尽管差异不显著(p = 0.060)。留语音邮件的患者返回急诊科的可能性并不更高(p = 0.230)。然而,直接联系的患者表示他们更有可能遵守收到的出院指示(p = 0.010)。给患者打电话也没有显著影响他们是否会去看门诊医生(p = 0.999)或在30天内返回同一家急诊科(p = 0.999)。
尽管通常有许多复杂因素影响患者在急诊科就诊后的护理决策,但这个规模较小的项目结果表明,在急诊科出院后联系患者可能有助于影响他们对护理的认知,并影响一些随访护理偏好。