Suppr超能文献

电话、短信还是打字:急诊科出院后医患沟通的随机试验

Telephoned, Texted, or Typed Out: A Randomized Trial of Physician-Patient Communication After Emergency Department Discharge.

作者信息

Shuen Jessica A, Wilson Michael P, Kreshak Allyson, Mullinax Samuel, Brennan Jesse, Castillo Edward M, Hinkle Corinne, Vilke Gary M

机构信息

Emergency Trauma Department, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey.

Division of Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; Department of Emergency Medicine Behavioral Emergencies Research (DEMBER) lab, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;55(4):573-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Novel means of emergency department (ED) post-discharge communication-telephone callbacks and text messages-are increasingly being utilized to facilitate patient-oriented outcomes, such as ED revisits, patient adherence, and satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

The primary measure of interest is the rate of ED revisits in the week after discharge. The secondary measures of interests are rate of primary medical doctor (PMD) or specialist physician contact in the week after discharge and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

Pilot randomized controlled trial with three groups: usual discharge; usual care + phone call 48 h after discharge asking if patients wanted to speak with a physician; or usual care + text message 48 h after discharge asking if patients wanted to speak with a physician. All participants received a 1-week assessment of patient satisfaction. ED revisit and contact with PMD or specialist physician within 7 days of discharge were obtained from electronic medical record and analyzed using χ test.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one patients were enrolled and randomized (66 control, 103 phone, 82 text). Although the three groups did not show a statistically significant difference, the phone and text groups had similar and lower proportions of patients revisiting the ED (>50% reduction) and calling or visiting their PMD or specialist physician (approximately 30% reduction) than the control group (χ = 4.57, degrees of freedom [df] = 2, p = 0.10; χ = 1.36, df = 2, p = 0.51). There was no difference in patient satisfaction (χ = 2.88, df = 2, p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are contacted for ED follow-up by phone and text, though perhaps not more satisfied, may tend to revisit the ED and contact their PMD or specialty physician less often than patients receiving standard written discharge instructions. However, this pilot study is underpowered, so larger randomized studies are needed to confirm.

摘要

背景

急诊科出院后沟通的新方式——电话回访和短信——越来越多地被用于促进以患者为导向的结果,如急诊科复诊、患者依从性和满意度。

目的

主要关注的指标是出院后一周内的急诊科复诊率。次要关注指标是出院后一周内与初级医生(PMD)或专科医生联系的比率以及患者满意度。

方法

进行三组的试点随机对照试验:常规出院;常规护理+出院48小时后打电话询问患者是否想与医生交谈;或常规护理+出院48小时后发短信询问患者是否想与医生交谈。所有参与者都接受了为期1周的患者满意度评估。从电子病历中获取出院7天内的急诊科复诊情况以及与PMD或专科医生的联系情况,并使用χ检验进行分析。

结果

共招募并随机分配了251名患者(66名对照组,103名电话组,82名短信组)。虽然三组之间没有显示出统计学上的显著差异,但电话组和短信组复诊急诊科的患者比例相似且低于对照组(降低>50%),打电话或拜访其PMD或专科医生的患者比例也低于对照组(降低约30%)(χ=4.57,自由度[df]=2,p=0.10;χ=1.36,df=2,p=0.51)。患者满意度没有差异(χ=2.88,df=2,p=0.24)。

结论

通过电话和短信进行急诊科随访的患者,虽然可能没有更高的满意度,但与接受标准书面出院指导的患者相比,可能较少复诊急诊科并联系其PMD或专科医生。然而,这项试点研究的样本量不足,因此需要更大规模的随机研究来证实。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验