Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2213154. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13154.
The emergency department (ED) discharge process often involves haste and poor communication.
To assess the association of an automated telephone call 2 days after ED discharge with the likelihood of an unplanned ED revisit at both 72 hours and 7 days after the index visit and with perceived care metrics measured at 14 days.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted at a single academically affiliated county emergency department among 8110 patients presenting to and discharged from the ED during a 10-week period from June 25 to August 30, 2018. Initial statistical analysis was performed from February 1 to November 30, 2020, with additional analyses performed from March 1 to 16, 2022.
Participants were allocated in a nonrandom fashion to 1 of 2 groups: patients who received an automated telephone call 2 days after discharge were compared with patients who received no call 2 days after discharge. All patients received a telephone questionnaire at 14 days to assess secondary outcome measures.
The primary outcome was a return visit to the ED at 7 days. Secondary outcomes included a return visit to the ED within 72 hours, a return visit to the ED within 7 days resulting in hospital admission, and patient-reported perceptions of their care measured by 4 questions related to quality metrics assessed at 14 days. A secondary analysis compared patients who actually responded to the initial call at 2 days with all nonresponders, regardless of whether they received a call. Analyses were made on an intention-to-treat basis.
More than 15 000 patients were seen in the ED during the 10-week study period, and 10 948 were discharged. A total of 8110 patient encounters (4460 male patients [55.0%]; 3313 Hispanic patients [40.9%]; mean [SD] age, 40.5 [19.4] years) were enrolled. A total of 2958 patients (36.5%) received an automated telephone call at 2 days after discharge, while 5152 (63.5%) received no call. Rates of ED return within 7 days of the initial index visit were significantly lower among those who received a call at 2 days than those who did not receive a call (224 of 2958 [7.6%] vs 533 of 5152 [10.3%]; P < .001). Patients who received a 2-day call were more likely than those who did not receive a call to have followed up with a health care clinician (67.9% [374 of 551] vs 66.3% [604 of 911]), understood their health issues (77.5% [490 of 632] vs 74.9% [780 of 1042]), and have received their discharge medications (87.0% [507 of 583] vs 83.6% [793 of 949]), although none of these differences between the 2 groups were statistically significant.
A telephone call to patients 2 days after discharge from the ED was associated with decreased ED use at 7 days after the index visit and may have been associated with marginal improvements in measured quality of care metrics.
急诊科(ED)出院过程通常涉及仓促和沟通不畅。
评估 ED 出院后 2 天进行自动电话随访与索引就诊后 72 小时和 7 天内再次就诊的可能性以及在 14 天内测量的感知护理指标之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性非随机临床试验在 2018 年 6 月 25 日至 8 月 30 日的 10 周期间在一家附属县级急诊室进行,共有 8110 名就诊并出院的患者。初始统计分析于 2020 年 2 月 1 日至 11 月 30 日进行,额外分析于 2022 年 3 月 1 日至 16 日进行。
患者以非随机方式分配到以下 2 组中的 1 组:出院后 2 天接受自动电话随访的患者与出院后 2 天未接受电话随访的患者进行比较。所有患者在 14 天内通过电话问卷调查评估次要结局。
主要结局是在第 7 天返回 ED。次要结局包括在 72 小时内返回 ED、在第 7 天内返回 ED 导致住院,以及通过 4 个与在第 14 天评估的质量指标相关的问题来衡量患者对其护理的感知。一项次要分析比较了实际回复 2 天初始电话的患者与所有未回复者(无论是否接听电话)。分析基于意向治疗进行。
在为期 10 周的研究期间,ED 共接诊超过 15000 名患者,出院 10948 名。共纳入 8110 例患者就诊(4460 名男性患者[55.0%];3313 名西班牙裔患者[40.9%];平均[SD]年龄,40.5[19.4]岁)。共有 2958 名患者(36.5%)在出院后 2 天接受了自动电话随访,而 5152 名患者(63.5%)未接到电话。与未接到电话的患者相比,接到电话的患者在初始就诊后 7 天内返回 ED 的比例显著降低(224 例[7.6%]与 533 例[10.3%];P < .001)。与未接到电话的患者相比,接到电话的患者更有可能在后续时间内联系了医疗保健临床医生(67.9%[374/551]与 66.3%[604/911]),理解了自己的健康问题(77.5%[490/632]与 74.9%[780/1042]),并获得了出院药物(87.0%[507/583]与 83.6%[793/949]),尽管两组之间的这些差异均无统计学意义。
ED 出院后 2 天给患者打电话与索引就诊后 7 天内 ED 使用减少相关,并且可能与测量的护理质量指标的轻微改善相关。