Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1414-1421. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01973-9. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
Situational judgment tests (SJTs) are often used in aptitude testing and present practice-specific challenges. Their implementation into online training programs provides the opportunity to assess learning progress and improve training quality. In this study, text-based SJTs for oncology physicians were developed, validated, and implemented into the KOKON-KTO training which uses a blended learning training format to teach oncology physicians how to consult cancer patients on complementary and integrative medicine (CIM). The SJT was implemented to measure the e-learning results. In the development and validation phase, a total of 15 SJTs (each SJT including 1 best choice answer based on training content and 4 distractors; 9 SJTs for oncologists and 6 SJTs for oncology gynecologists only) were developed by an interprofessional team (n=5) using real-case vignettes and applying an in-depth review process. Best answers were validated by experts (oncologists and oncology gynecologists) with experience in advising cancer patients on CIM. In the implementation and evaluation phase, SJTs were answered by KOKON-KTO training participants (n=19) pre- and post e-learning. Results were analyzed using descriptive measurements, item difficulties, and Cohen's d for effect size pre- and post-training. The experts (n=12, 49.8% gynecologists) agreed with best choice answers (69.4% for oncology gynecology; 81.5% for oncology) in 12 out of 15 SJTs. Comparing pre- and post-training scores, KOKON-KTO training participants were able to improve knowledge substantially (effect sizes for oncologists d=1.7; oncology gynecologists d= .71). Future studies need to increase the number of experts and SJTs in order to apply further psychometric measurements. As part of the KOKON-KTO study, this project is registered as DRKS00012704 on the "German Clinical Trials Register" (Date of registration: 28.08.2017).
情境判断测验(SJTs)常用于能力倾向测试,并呈现出特定的实践挑战。将其应用于在线培训计划中,提供了评估学习进展和提高培训质量的机会。在这项研究中,为肿瘤医师开发、验证并实施了基于文本的 SJTs,这些 SJTs 纳入了 KOKON-KTO 培训中,该培训采用混合学习培训模式,教授肿瘤医师如何就补充和整合医学(CIM)咨询癌症患者。SJTs 用于衡量电子学习的结果。在开发和验证阶段,由跨专业团队(n=5)使用真实案例小插曲并应用深入审查过程,共开发了 15 个 SJTs(每个 SJT 包括 1 个基于培训内容和 4 个干扰项的最佳选择答案;9 个 SJTs 针对肿瘤医师,6 个 SJTs 仅针对肿瘤妇科医师)。最佳答案由在 CIM 咨询癌症患者方面具有经验的专家(肿瘤医师和肿瘤妇科医师)验证。在实施和评估阶段,KOKON-KTO 培训参与者(n=19)在电子学习前后回答了 SJTs。使用描述性测量、项目难度和培训前后的 Cohen's d 对效应大小进行了分析。12 名专家(n=12,49.8%为妇科医师)对 15 个 SJTs 中的 12 个同意最佳选择答案(肿瘤妇科为 69.4%;肿瘤为 81.5%)。与培训前相比,KOKON-KTO 培训参与者的知识显著提高(肿瘤医师 d=1.7;肿瘤妇科医师 d=0.71)。未来的研究需要增加专家和 SJTs 的数量,以便应用进一步的心理测量测量。作为 KOKON-KTO 研究的一部分,该项目在“德国临床试验注册”(DRKS00012704)上注册。