187431Artvin Coruh University, Turkey.
5228University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
J Intellect Disabil. 2022 Mar;26(1):195-210. doi: 10.1177/1744629521991409. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Education laws in the U.S. hold schools accountable for including students with intellectual disability on statewide reading assessments. Students with intellectual disability have been taking general or alternate reading assessments over the past two decades. However, very little attention has been given to the results of these assessments. The purpose of this study was to examine reading outcomes of students with intellectual disability on statewide general and alternate assessments in a Midwestern state in the U.S. We also examined whether students with intellectual disability's reading outcomes varied across traditional and innovative school types. Results from descriptive analyses showed that a very low percentage of students with intellectual disability performed at the proficient level or above on 5th and 8th grades reading assessments. Also, students with intellectual disability's reading proficiency levels did not significantly differ across school types. Implications of these results are discussed and recommendations for future research are provided.
美国的教育法规定,学校有责任让有智力障碍的学生参加全州范围的阅读评估。在过去的二十年里,有智力障碍的学生一直在参加普通或替代阅读评估。然而,这些评估的结果很少受到关注。本研究的目的是在美国中西部的一个州,研究智力障碍学生在全州普通和替代阅读评估中的阅读成绩。我们还研究了智力障碍学生的阅读成绩是否因传统和创新学校类型的不同而有所不同。描述性分析的结果表明,只有极少数智力障碍学生在五年级和八年级的阅读评估中达到熟练或以上水平。此外,智力障碍学生的阅读熟练程度在学校类型之间没有显著差异。讨论了这些结果的意义,并为未来的研究提供了建议。