Suppr超能文献

验证过度漫游量表(MEWS-G)的德语版本。

Validation of the German Version of the Mind Excessively Wandering Scale (MEWS-G).

机构信息

Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Klinik für Abhängiges Verhalten, Klinische Fakultät Mannheim.

Median Klinik für Psychsosomatik, Bad Duerkheim.

出版信息

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2021 Dec;89(12):607-616. doi: 10.1055/a-1362-9743. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Abstract

Increasing evidence shows that unintentional mind wandering is linked to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and that its frequency contributes to symptom severity and functional impairment in ADHD. However, empirical data on mind wandering in adult ADHD are still scarce, and a validated scale to assess mind wandering in German adult ADHD patients is lacking. The primary aim of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of the German version of the recently published Mind Excessively Wandering Scale (MEWS-G) in terms of factorial structure and factor stability, internal consistency and construct validity. Analyses were performed in 128 adults with ADHD, clinical and healthy controls. As described for the original English 15-item version of the scale, we found lowest item-total-correlations for items 6, 10 and 14 with item-total correlation of all: 0.54/ADHD: 0.32 (item 6), all: 0.55/ADHD: 0.39 (item 10) and all: 0.11/ADHD: -0.04 (item 14). Item-total correlations for the remaining items were 0.65-0.86 and Cronbach Alpha was 0.96 indicating good internal consistency of the 12-item version of scale, on which we based all further analyses. Principal component analysis indicated a one- and two- factorial scale structure respectively explaining 71.7 % and 78.7 % of variance. Both factors showed good stability with lower stability of the factor-2 solution if sample size was reduced. The two-factorial solution also had many cross-loadings and a strong correlation of both factors in confirmatory factorial analysis (rf1f2 = 0.87). It probably describes related and interdependent, but not distinct facets of mind wandering, which strongly argues for the one factorial structure of the scale. Mean MEWS-G score in ADHD was 23.77 ± 7.85 compared to 7.64 ± 7.27 in controls (p < .0001). According to ROC, the optimal cut-off point to discriminate ADHD and controls is at MEWS-G score = 13. On the symptom level, MEWS-G score was correlated with ADHD, depressive and total psychiatric symptom scores, on the personality level with neuroticsm and negatively with conscientiousness and on the functional level with social interaction difficulties and impaired self-efficacy. In summary, our study shows that MEWS-G is a reliable, valid instrument to assess spontaneous mind wandering in adult ADHD and to discriminate between ADHD and controls.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,无意的思维漫游与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)有关,其频率与 ADHD 的症状严重程度和功能障碍有关。然而,成人 ADHD 中思维漫游的实证数据仍然很少,并且缺乏用于评估德国成年 ADHD 患者思维漫游的经过验证的量表。本研究的主要目的是评估最近发表的《过度思维量表》(MEWS-G)德语版本的心理测量学特性,包括因子结构和因子稳定性、内部一致性和构念效度。在 128 名 ADHD 患者、临床和健康对照组中进行了分析。正如该量表英文 15 项版本所述,我们发现项目 6、10 和 14 的项目总分相关性最低,与所有项目的相关性分别为:ADHD:0.54/0.32(项目 6),所有项目:0.55/0.39(项目 10)和所有项目:0.11/-0.04(项目 14)。其余项目的项目总分相关性为 0.65-0.86,Cronbach Alpha 为 0.96,表明量表 12 项版本的内部一致性良好,我们在此基础上进行了所有进一步的分析。主成分分析表明,一个和两个因子量表结构分别解释了 71.7%和 78.7%的方差。如果样本量减少,两个因子都显示出良好的稳定性,而因子 2 解决方案的稳定性较低。在验证性因子分析中,两个因子解决方案也有许多交叉负荷和两个因子之间的强相关性(rf1f2=0.87)。它可能描述了思维漫游的相关且相互依存的、但不明显的方面,这强烈支持了该量表的一个因子结构。ADHD 组的平均 MEWS-G 得分为 23.77±7.85,对照组为 7.64±7.27(p<0.0001)。根据 ROC,区分 ADHD 和对照组的最佳截断值为 MEWS-G 得分=13。在症状水平上,MEWS-G 得分与 ADHD、抑郁和总精神病症状评分相关,在人格水平上与神经质相关,与尽责性呈负相关,在功能水平上与社交互动困难和自我效能受损相关。总之,我们的研究表明,MEWS-G 是一种可靠、有效的工具,可用于评估成人 ADHD 中的自发性思维漫游,并区分 ADHD 和对照组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验