• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨越学术界限保障诊断安全:从临床视角和高可靠性组织原则看 10 个复杂挑战及潜在解决方案。

Crossing Academic Boundaries for Diagnostic Safety: 10 Complex Challenges and Potential Solutions From Clinical Perspectives and High-Reliability Organizing Principles.

机构信息

24575 University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center. Case Western Reserve University, Ohio, USA.

14661500 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2022 Feb;64(1):6-20. doi: 10.1177/0018720821996187. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1177/0018720821996187
PMID:33657891
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We apply the high-reliability organization (HRO) paradigm to the diagnostic process, outlining challenges to enacting HRO principles in diagnosis and offering solutions for how diagnostic process stakeholders can overcome these barriers.

BACKGROUND

Evidence shows that healthcare is starting to organize for higher reliability by employing various principles and practices of HRO. These hold promise for enhancing safer care, but there has been little consideration of the challenges that clinicians and healthcare systems face while enacting HRO principles in the diagnostic process. To effectively deploy the HRO perspective, these barriers must be seriously considered.

METHOD

We review key principles of the HRO paradigm, the diagnostic errors and harms that potentially can be prevented by its enactment, the challenges that clinicians and healthcare systems face in executing various principles and practices, and possible solutions that clinicians and organizational leaders can take to overcome these challenges and barriers.

RESULTS

Our analyses reveal multiple challenges including the inherent diagnostic uncertainty; the lack of diagnosis-focused performance feedback; the fact that diagnosis is often a solo, rather than team, activity; the tendency to simplify the diagnostic process; and professional and institutional status hierarchies. But these challenges are not insurmountable-there are strategies and solutions available to overcome them.

CONCLUSION

The HRO lens offers some important ideas for how the safety of the diagnostic process can be improved.

APPLICATION

The ideas proposed here can be enacted by both individual clinicians and healthcare leaders; both are necessary for making systematic progress in enhancing diagnostic performance.

摘要

目的

我们将高可靠性组织(HRO)范式应用于诊断过程,概述在诊断中实施 HRO 原则所面临的挑战,并为诊断过程的利益相关者提供克服这些障碍的解决方案。

背景

有证据表明,医疗保健行业开始通过采用各种 HRO 原则和实践来组织更高的可靠性。这些原则有望提高更安全的护理,但很少考虑临床医生和医疗保健系统在诊断过程中实施 HRO 原则所面临的挑战。为了有效地部署 HRO 视角,必须认真考虑这些障碍。

方法

我们回顾了 HRO 范式的关键原则、通过实施这些原则可以预防的诊断错误和危害、临床医生和医疗保健系统在执行各种原则和实践中面临的挑战,以及临床医生和组织领导者可以采取的可能解决方案来克服这些挑战和障碍。

结果

我们的分析揭示了多个挑战,包括固有的诊断不确定性、缺乏以诊断为重点的绩效反馈、诊断通常是一项单独而非团队活动的事实、简化诊断过程的倾向以及专业和机构等级制度。但这些挑战并非不可逾越——有策略和解决方案可以克服它们。

结论

HRO 视角为如何提高诊断过程的安全性提供了一些重要思路。

应用

这里提出的想法可以由临床医生和医疗保健领导者共同实施;两者对于系统地提高诊断性能都很有必要。

相似文献

1
Crossing Academic Boundaries for Diagnostic Safety: 10 Complex Challenges and Potential Solutions From Clinical Perspectives and High-Reliability Organizing Principles.跨越学术界限保障诊断安全:从临床视角和高可靠性组织原则看 10 个复杂挑战及潜在解决方案。
Hum Factors. 2022 Feb;64(1):6-20. doi: 10.1177/0018720821996187. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Striving for high reliability in healthcare: a qualitative study of the implementation of a hospital safety programme.追求医疗保健领域的高可靠性:一项关于医院安全计划实施情况的定性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Dec;31(12):867-877. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013938. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Implementing High-Reliability Organization Principles Into Practice: A Rapid Evidence Review.将高可靠性组织原则付诸实践:快速证据回顾。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e320-e328. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000768.
5
Adopting high reliability organization principles to lead a large scale clinical transformation.采用高可靠性组织原则引领大规模临床变革。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2023 Jul;36(4):241-245. doi: 10.1177/08404704231162785. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
Manifestations of High-Reliability Principles on Hospital Units With Varying Safety Profiles: A Qualitative Analysis.高可靠性原则在具有不同安全状况的医院科室中的表现:一项定性分析
J Nurs Care Qual. 2019 Jul/Sep;34(3):230-235. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000368.
7
How the Five Principles of High Reliability Organizations Align with the Five Truths of Special Operations.高可靠性组织的五项原则如何与特种作战的五项真理相一致。
J Spec Oper Med. 2023 Jun 23;23(2):94-98. doi: 10.55460/HOBU-RZGM.
8
Caveats for high reliability in healthcare.医疗保健领域高可靠性的注意事项。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Aug 20;32(5):674-690. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2017-0286. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
High-reliability organisation principles implemented in dentistry.在牙科中实施高可靠性组织原则。
Br Dent J. 2022 Jun;232(12):879-885. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4354-z. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-informed exploration of the aftermath of a diagnostic problem or mistake based on results of a national survey.基于一项全国性调查结果,患者对诊断问题或失误后果的知情性探究。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Nov 28;4:1474073. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1474073. eCollection 2024.