Galang Carl Michael, Johnson Devin, Obhi Sukhvinder S
Social Brain, Body and Action Lab, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 15;12:588934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588934. eCollection 2021.
Social distancing has become the most prominent measure many countries have implemented to combat the spread of COVID-19. The aim of the current study was to explore the potential role of empathy and self-construal styles, as individual personality traits, on self-reported social distancing. Participants completed the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (a multi-dimensional measure of trait-levels of empathy), the Singelis Self-Construal Scale (a measure of self-construal styles), and were asked to rate their level of social distancing and how much they endorsed social distancing on a five-point Likert-scale. Across a large and diverse sample (with participants collected from Canada, United Kingdom, Sweden, and United States; total = 967), results showed that trait-levels of empathic concern (EC) and perspective taking (PT) positively correlates with social distancing. However, we did not find evidence to suggest that trait-levels of personal distress correlates with social distancing. We interpret these findings as suggesting that empathy, both its altruistic (EC) and cognitive (PT) dimensions, plays an important role in motivating people to socially distance and should be emphasized during times of crisis. Furthermore, we suggest that emphasizing a person's self-distress during times of crisis may not be an effective approach in promotion social distancing policies (or other prosocial behaviors). We also found that independence and interdependence self-construal styles positively correlates with social distancing. While we expected the latter result, we did not expect the former. This suggests that more work is needed to fully understand how self-construal styles, along with their cultural level analogs (i.e., Individualism-Collectivism), influences social distancing. Overall, these results provide us with novel multi-national data about the role of individual differences on social distancing tendencies specifically, and human behavior during a global health crisis more generally.
社交距离已成为许多国家为抗击新冠疫情传播而实施的最突出措施。本研究的目的是探讨共情和自我构念方式作为个体人格特质,在自我报告的社交距离方面所起的潜在作用。参与者完成了人际反应指数(一种特质水平共情的多维测量)、辛吉斯自我构念量表(一种自我构念方式的测量),并被要求在五点李克特量表上对自己的社交距离水平以及对社交距离的认可程度进行评分。在一个规模庞大且多样化的样本中(参与者来自加拿大、英国、瑞典和美国;共967人),结果显示,特质水平的共情关注(EC)和观点采择(PT)与社交距离呈正相关。然而,我们没有发现证据表明特质水平的个人痛苦与社交距离相关。我们将这些发现解释为,共情,包括其利他维度(EC)和认知维度(PT),在促使人们保持社交距离方面发挥着重要作用,在危机时期应予以强调。此外,我们认为在危机时期强调个人痛苦可能不是促进社交距离政策(或其他亲社会行为)的有效方法。我们还发现,独立和相互依存的自我构念方式与社交距离呈正相关。虽然我们预期会有后一个结果,但没有预期到前一个结果。这表明需要做更多工作来全面理解自我构念方式及其文化层面的类似概念(即个人主义 - 集体主义)如何影响社交距离。总体而言,这些结果为我们提供了新的跨国数据,具体说明了个体差异在社交距离倾向方面的作用,更广泛地说,说明了全球健康危机期间的人类行为。