Ngaage Ledibabari M, Ge Shealinna, Gao Cynthia, Ha Michael, Rosen Carly, Siegel Gabrielle, Driscoll Marcia, Rasko Yvonne M
Plastic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Dec 31;12(12):e12411. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12411.
Introduction Research can be used to enhance the competitiveness of an application and is associated with a successful match. However, current reports regarding the publication record among prospective dermatology residents may be inaccurate. We sought to accurately assess the research credentials of matched dermatology residency candidates at the time of application. Methods We performed a bibliometric analysis to identify published articles of 1152 matched dermatology candidates and calculated the h-index of each applicant at the time of application. Details on article type, first authorship, and dermatology-relatedness of articles were collected. Results The median number of publications was two and the median h-index was 0. At the time of residency application, one-quarter of matched dermatology candidates (24%, n=278) possessed no publications. Over time, the median number of publications (R 0.10, p<0.001) and h-index (R 0.07, p=0.014) of matched applicants increased. The proportion of first-authored articles, dermatology-related papers, and each article type remained constant across application cycles (p>0.0500). An additional graduate degree, completion of a research fellowship, and graduation from a non-US medical school were independently associated with greater research credentials (p<0.0500). Conclusions Each year, applicants are publishing more articles and have a greater scholarly impact than in previous application cycles. However, the verified publication volume of matched dermatology applicants is strikingly lower than the values reported in national statistics.
引言 研究可用于提高申请的竞争力,并与成功匹配相关。然而,目前有关皮肤科住院医师申请者发表记录的报告可能不准确。我们试图准确评估皮肤科住院医师匹配候选人在申请时的研究资质。方法 我们进行了文献计量分析,以确定1152名匹配的皮肤科候选人发表的文章,并计算了每位申请人在申请时的h指数。收集了文章类型、第一作者身份以及文章与皮肤科相关性的详细信息。结果 出版物的中位数为两篇,h指数的中位数为0。在住院医师申请时,四分之一的匹配皮肤科候选人(24%,n = 278)没有发表过文章。随着时间的推移,匹配申请人的出版物中位数(R = 0.10,p < 0.001)和h指数(R = 0.07,p = 0.014)有所增加。在各个申请周期中,第一作者文章、皮肤科相关论文以及每种文章类型的比例保持不变(p > 0.0500)。额外的研究生学位、完成研究奖学金以及毕业于非美国医学院与更高的研究资质独立相关(p < 0.0500)。结论 每年,申请人发表的文章比以前的申请周期更多,学术影响力也更大。然而,经核实的皮肤科匹配申请人的发表量明显低于国家统计数据中报告的数值。