Suppr超能文献

开发书面考试试题的研讨会上线:根据参与者的情况采用适当的形式。

Workshops for developing written exam questions go online: appropriate format according to the participants.

机构信息

Universität Bern, Institut für medizinische Lehre, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;38(1):Doc17. doi: 10.3205/zma001413. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The Corona pandemic has made it difficult to conduct face-to-face events, which is why two workshops planned for the development of multiple choice (MC) questions were conducted online. Whether the online format is suitable for MC question development has not yet been described to our knowledge. The study aimed to answer the following questions from the perspective of the participants: How are the two online workshops evaluated in terms of their implementation? Are these online workshops suitable for developing MC questions? Is the online or face-to-face format preferred? As a measure of efficiency, it was examined whether the expected question output (standard of comparable face-to-face workshops) was achieved in the online workshops. In May and June 2020, two online workshops with a total of 24 participants were conducted for Swiss professional societies with SWITCHinteract. The participants' feedback was collected via an anonymous online survey with 21 questions. 88% of the participants took part in the voluntary online survey. The participants were satisfied with the implementation and found the online format suitable. The majority of the participants did not show a preference for a certain format (online vs. face-to-face), although in case of a format preference the online format was indicated more often. The expected question output was exceeded in both workshops. Technical aspects were most frequently cited as requiring improvement. Based on the results, online workshops for MC question development can be considered as a resource-saving and efficient alternative to face-to-face workshops. Increased use and optimization of online tools could further facilitate implementation and influence the format preference.

摘要

新冠疫情大流行使得面对面的活动变得困难,这就是为什么为多选题(MC)开发计划了两个在线研讨会的原因。据我们所知,在线形式是否适合 MC 问题开发尚未有相关描述。本研究旨在从参与者的角度回答以下问题:参与者如何评估这两个在线研讨会的实施情况?这些在线研讨会是否适合开发 MC 问题?他们更喜欢在线形式还是面对面形式?作为效率的衡量标准,我们还检查了在线研讨会是否达到了预期的问题输出(与面对面研讨会相当的标准)。

2020 年 5 月至 6 月,使用 SWITCHinteract 为瑞士专业协会举办了两个共 24 名参与者的在线研讨会。参与者的反馈是通过一项包含 21 个问题的匿名在线调查收集的。

88%的参与者参加了自愿性在线调查。参与者对实施情况表示满意,并认为在线形式合适。大多数参与者没有对特定格式(在线与面对面)表现出偏好,尽管在格式偏好的情况下,更倾向于在线格式。两个研讨会都超出了预期的问题输出。技术方面是最常被提到需要改进的方面。

根据研究结果,在线 MC 问题开发研讨会可以被视为一种节省资源且高效的面对面研讨会替代方案。更多地使用和优化在线工具可以进一步促进实施,并影响格式偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3a7/7899100/c6ca0aa8ee50/JME-38-1-17-t-001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验