Chatterjee Archana, Mavunda Kunjana, Krilov Leonard R
Department of Pediatrics, Sanford Children's Specialty Clinic, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Kidz Medical Services, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Mar;10(Suppl 1):5-16. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00387-2. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of hospitalizations due to pneumonia and bronchiolitis. Substantial morbidity and socioeconomic burden are associated with RSV infection worldwide. Populations with higher susceptibility to developing severe RSV include premature infants, children with chronic lung disease of prematurity (CLDP) or congenital heart disease (CHD), elderly individuals aged > 65 years, and immunocompromised individuals. In the pediatric population, RSV can lead to long-term sequelae such as wheezing and asthma, which are associated with increased health care costs and reduced quality of life. Treatment for RSV is mainly supportive, and general preventive measures such as good hygiene and isolation are highly recommended. Although vaccine development for RSV has been a global priority, attempts to date have failed to yield a safe and effective product for clinical use. Currently, palivizumab is the only immunoprophylaxis (IP) available to prevent severe RSV in specific high-risk pediatric populations. Well-controlled, randomized clinical trials have established the efficacy of palivizumab in reducing RSV hospitalization (RSVH) in high-risk infants including moderate- to late-preterm infants. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), in its 2014 policy, stopped recommending RSV IP use for ≥ 29 weeks' gestational age infants. Revisions to the AAP policy for RSV IP have largely narrowed the proportion of pediatric patients eligible to receive RSV IP and have been associated with an increase in RSVH and morbidity. On the other hand, after reviewing the recent evidence on RSV burden, the National Perinatal Association, in its 2018 clinical practice guidelines, recommended RSV IP use for a wider pediatric population. As the AAP recommendations drive insurance reimbursements for RSV IP, they should be revised to help further mitigate RSV disease burden.
呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是导致因肺炎和细支气管炎而住院的主要原因。在全球范围内,RSV感染会带来大量发病情况以及社会经济负担。易发展为严重RSV感染的人群包括早产儿、患有早产儿慢性肺病(CLDP)或先天性心脏病(CHD)的儿童、65岁以上的老年人以及免疫功能低下者。在儿科人群中,RSV可导致诸如喘息和哮喘等长期后遗症,这与医疗保健成本增加和生活质量下降有关。RSV的治疗主要是支持性治疗,强烈建议采取良好卫生习惯和隔离等一般预防措施。尽管RSV疫苗研发一直是全球优先事项,但迄今为止的尝试未能产生可用于临床的安全有效产品。目前,帕利珠单抗是唯一可用于预防特定高危儿科人群严重RSV感染的免疫预防药物。严格对照的随机临床试验已证实帕利珠单抗在降低包括中度至晚期早产儿在内的高危婴儿RSV住院率(RSVH)方面的疗效。然而,美国儿科学会(AAP)在其2014年政策中,不再建议对胎龄≥29周的婴儿使用RSV免疫预防药物。AAP关于RSV免疫预防药物政策的修订在很大程度上缩小了有资格接受RSV免疫预防药物的儿科患者比例,并与RSVH和发病率增加有关。另一方面,在审查了近期关于RSV负担的证据后,美国围产医学协会在其2018年临床实践指南中建议对更广泛的儿科人群使用RSV免疫预防药物。由于AAP的建议推动了RSV免疫预防药物的保险报销,因此应修订这些建议以帮助进一步减轻RSV疾病负担。